Re: [PATCHv4 09/30] x86/tdx: Add MSR support for TDX guests

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 2/24/22 07:56, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx.c
> > index 0a2e6be0cdae..89992593a209 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx.c
> > @@ -116,6 +116,44 @@ void __cpuidle tdx_safe_halt(void)
> >  		WARN_ONCE(1, "HLT instruction emulation failed\n");
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool read_msr(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	struct tdx_hypercall_args args = {
> > +		.r10 = TDX_HYPERCALL_STANDARD,
> > +		.r11 = EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ,
> 
> Just a minor note: these "EXIT_REASON_FOO"'s in r11 are effectively
> *the* hypercall being made, right?
> 
> The hypercall is being made in response to what would have otherwise
> been a MSR read VMEXIT.  But, it's a *bit* goofy to see them here when
> the TDX guest isn't doing any kind of VMEXIT.

But the TDX guest is doing a VM-Exit, that's all TDCALL is, an exit to the host.
r10 states that this is a GHCI-standard hypercall, r11 holds the reason why the
guest is exiting to the host.  The guest could pretty it up by redefining all the
VM-Exit reasons as TDX_REQUEST_MSR_READ or whatever, but IMO diverging from
directly using EXIT_REASON_* will be annoying in the long run, e.g. will make it
more difficult to grep KVM + kernel to understand the end-to-end flow.