public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Reacquire kvm->srcu in vcpu_run() if exiting on pending signal
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 20:49:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YhfvRRa56qQR9w5K@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220224190609.3464071-1-seanjc@google.com>

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Reacquire kvm->srcu in vcpu_run() before returning to the caller if srcu
> was dropped to handle pending work.  If the task receives a signal, KVM
> will exit without reacquiring kvm->srcu, resulting in an unbalanced
> unlock kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(), and eventually hung tasks.
> 
>  =====================================
>  WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
>  5.17.0-rc3+ #749 Not tainted
>  -------------------------------------
>  CPU 0/KVM/1803 is trying to release lock (&kvm->srcu) at:
>  [<ffffffff81042a19>] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x669/0x1f60
>  but there are no more locks to release!
> 
>  other info that might help us debug this:
>  1 lock held by CPU 0/KVM/1803:
>   #0: ffff88810489c0b0 (&vcpu->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x77/0x690
> 
>  stack backtrace:
>  CPU: 7 PID: 1803 Comm: CPU 0/KVM Not tainted 5.17.0-rc3+ #749
>  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44
>   lock_release+0x1b4/0x240
>   kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x680/0x1f60
>   kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x279/0x690
>   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
>   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>   </TASK>
>  INFO: task stable:2347 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>        Not tainted 5.17.0-rc3+ #749
>  "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>  task:stable          state:D stack:    0 pid: 2347 ppid:  2340 flags:0x00000000
>  Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   __schedule+0x328/0xa00
>   schedule+0x44/0xb0
>   schedule_timeout+0x26f/0x300
>   wait_for_completion+0x84/0xe0
>   __synchronize_srcu.part.0+0x7a/0xa0
>   kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x141/0x180
>   kvm_set_memslot+0x2f9/0x470
>   kvm_set_memory_region+0x29/0x40
>   kvm_vm_ioctl+0x2c3/0xd70
>   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
>   do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>   </TASK>
>  INFO: lockdep is turned off.

Ugh, the task hung is actually a different mess introduced by the same patch.
I suspect I'm hitting the one Like reported.

I'll get a fix posted shortly...

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-24 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-24 19:06 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Reacquire kvm->srcu in vcpu_run() if exiting on pending signal Sean Christopherson
2022-02-24 20:49 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-02-25  9:59 Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YhfvRRa56qQR9w5K@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox