public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: fix ptrace vs tasklist_lock race on PREEMPT_RT.
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 10:27:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yi8KiQClmDVBCfHq@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yh/b19JikC+Vnm8i@linutronix.de>

On 2022-03-02 22:04:25 [+0100], To linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org wrote:
> As explained by Alexander Fyodorov <halcy@yandex.ru>:
> 
> |read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in ptrace_stop() is converted to sleeping
> |lock on a PREEMPT_RT kernel, and it can remove __TASK_TRACED from
> |task->state (by moving  it to task->saved_state). If parent does
> |wait() on child followed by a sys_ptrace call, the following race can
> |happen:
> |
> |- child sets __TASK_TRACED in ptrace_stop()
> |- parent does wait() which eventually calls wait_task_stopped() and returns
> |  child's pid
> |- child blocks on read_lock(&tasklist_lock) in ptrace_stop() and moves
> |  __TASK_TRACED flag to saved_state
> |- parent calls sys_ptrace, which calls ptrace_check_attach() and
> |  wait_task_inactive()
> 
> The patch is based on his initial patch where an additional check is
> added in case the __TASK_TRACED moved to ->saved_state. The pi_lock is
> taken in case the caller is interrupted between looking into ->state and
> ->saved_state.
> 
> [ Fix for ptrace_unfreeze_traced() by Oleg Nesterov ]
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

ping.

> ---
> 
> I redid the state matching part compared to what I had in my queue so it
> hopefully looks better.
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/ptrace.c       |  25 +++++----
>  kernel/sched/core.c   |   5 +-
>  3 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 75ba8aa60248b..73109ce7ce789 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -118,12 +118,8 @@ struct task_group;
>  
>  #define task_is_running(task)		(READ_ONCE((task)->__state) == TASK_RUNNING)
>  
> -#define task_is_traced(task)		((READ_ONCE(task->__state) & __TASK_TRACED) != 0)
> -
>  #define task_is_stopped(task)		((READ_ONCE(task->__state) & __TASK_STOPPED) != 0)
>  
> -#define task_is_stopped_or_traced(task)	((READ_ONCE(task->__state) & (__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED)) != 0)
> -
>  /*
>   * Special states are those that do not use the normal wait-loop pattern. See
>   * the comment with set_special_state().
> @@ -2006,6 +2002,129 @@ static inline int test_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  	return unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk,TIF_NEED_RESCHED));
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
> +
> +static inline bool task_state_match_and(struct task_struct *tsk, long state)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool match = false;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> +	if (READ_ONCE(tsk->__state) & state)
> +		match = true;
> +	else if (tsk->saved_state & state)
> +		match = true;
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> +	return match;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool __task_state_match_eq(struct task_struct *tsk, long state)
> +{
> +	bool match = false;
> +
> +	if (READ_ONCE(tsk->__state) == state)
> +		match = true;
> +	else if (tsk->saved_state == state)
> +		match = true;
> +	return match;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool task_state_match_eq(struct task_struct *tsk, long state)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool match;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> +	match = __task_state_match_eq(tsk, state);
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> +	return match;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool task_state_match_and_set(struct task_struct *tsk, long state,
> +					    long new_state)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool match = false;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> +	if (READ_ONCE(tsk->__state) & state) {
> +		WRITE_ONCE(tsk->__state, new_state);
> +		match = true;
> +	} else if (tsk->saved_state & state) {
> +		tsk->__state = new_state;
> +		match = true;
> +	}
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> +	return match;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool task_state_match_eq_set(struct task_struct *tsk, long state,
> +					   long new_state)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool match = false;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> +	if (READ_ONCE(tsk->__state) == state) {
> +		WRITE_ONCE(tsk->__state, new_state);
> +		match = true;
> +	} else if (tsk->saved_state == state) {
> +		tsk->saved_state = new_state;
> +		match = true;
> +	}
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->pi_lock, flags);
> +	return match;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static inline bool task_state_match_and(struct task_struct *tsk, long state)
> +{
> +	return READ_ONCE(tsk->__state) & state;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool __task_state_match_eq(struct task_struct *tsk, long state)
> +{
> +	return READ_ONCE(tsk->__state) == state;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool task_state_match_eq(struct task_struct *tsk, long state)
> +{
> +	return __task_state_match_eq(tsk, state);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool task_state_match_and_set(struct task_struct *tsk, long state,
> +					    long new_state)
> +{
> +	if (READ_ONCE(tsk->__state) & state) {
> +		WRITE_ONCE(tsk->__state, new_state);
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool task_state_match_eq_set(struct task_struct *tsk, long state,
> +					   long new_state)
> +{
> +	if (READ_ONCE(tsk->__state) == state) {
> +		WRITE_ONCE(tsk->__state, new_state);
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> +static inline bool task_is_traced(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	return task_state_match_and(tsk, __TASK_TRACED);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool task_is_stopped_or_traced(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	return task_state_match_and(tsk, __TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * cond_resched() and cond_resched_lock(): latency reduction via
>   * explicit rescheduling in places that are safe. The return
> diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
> index eea265082e975..5ce0948c0c0a7 100644
> --- a/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -195,10 +195,10 @@ static bool ptrace_freeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
>  		return ret;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
> -	if (task_is_traced(task) && !looks_like_a_spurious_pid(task) &&
> -	    !__fatal_signal_pending(task)) {
> -		WRITE_ONCE(task->__state, __TASK_TRACED);
> -		ret = true;
> +	if (!looks_like_a_spurious_pid(task) && !__fatal_signal_pending(task)) {
> +
> +		ret = task_state_match_and_set(task, __TASK_TRACED,
> +					       __TASK_TRACED);
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
>  
> @@ -207,7 +207,10 @@ static bool ptrace_freeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
>  
>  static void ptrace_unfreeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
> -	if (READ_ONCE(task->__state) != __TASK_TRACED)
> +	bool frozen;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) &&
> +	    READ_ONCE(task->__state) != __TASK_TRACED)
>  		return;
>  
>  	WARN_ON(!task->ptrace || task->parent != current);
> @@ -217,12 +220,12 @@ static void ptrace_unfreeze_traced(struct task_struct *task)
>  	 * Recheck state under the lock to close this race.
>  	 */
>  	spin_lock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
> -	if (READ_ONCE(task->__state) == __TASK_TRACED) {
> -		if (__fatal_signal_pending(task))
> -			wake_up_state(task, __TASK_TRACED);
> -		else
> -			WRITE_ONCE(task->__state, TASK_TRACED);
> -	}
> +
> +	frozen = task_state_match_eq_set(task, __TASK_TRACED, TASK_TRACED);
> +
> +	if (frozen && __fatal_signal_pending(task))
> +		wake_up_state(task, __TASK_TRACED);
> +
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9745613d531ce..a44414946de3d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3239,7 +3239,8 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state
>  		 * is actually now running somewhere else!
>  		 */
>  		while (task_running(rq, p)) {
> -			if (match_state && unlikely(READ_ONCE(p->__state) != match_state))
> +			if (match_state &&
> +			    unlikely(!task_state_match_eq(p, match_state)))
>  				return 0;
>  			cpu_relax();
>  		}
> @@ -3254,7 +3255,7 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int match_state
>  		running = task_running(rq, p);
>  		queued = task_on_rq_queued(p);
>  		ncsw = 0;
> -		if (!match_state || READ_ONCE(p->__state) == match_state)
> +		if (!match_state || __task_state_match_eq(p, match_state))
>  			ncsw = p->nvcsw | LONG_MIN; /* sets MSB */
>  		task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-14  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-02 21:04 [PATCH] ptrace: fix ptrace vs tasklist_lock race on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-14  9:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-03-14 18:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2022-03-15  8:31   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-15 14:29     ` Oleg Nesterov
2022-03-16  8:23       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-31 14:25       ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-04-04 16:13         ` Oleg Nesterov
2022-04-05  8:34           ` Oleg Nesterov
2022-04-05 10:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-05 10:29           ` Oleg Nesterov
2022-04-05 11:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-07 12:13               ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-07 17:51                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-04-07 22:50                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-04-08  9:09                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 19:40                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-04-08 20:06                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-11 11:35                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-11 13:44                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-04-11 17:07                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-12 11:59                               ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yi8KiQClmDVBCfHq@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox