From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: robin.murphy@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, yf.wang@mediatek.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/iova: Improve 32-bit free space estimate
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:41:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiHey3lGHAMUp+oC@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220303233646.13773-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com>
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 07:36:46AM +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> > For various reasons based on the allocator behaviour and typical
> > use-cases at the time, when the max32_alloc_size optimisation was
> > introduced it seemed reasonable to couple the reset of the tracked
> > size to the update of cached32_node upon freeing a relevant IOVA.
> > However, since subsequent optimisations focused on helping genuine
> > 32-bit devices make best use of even more limited address spaces, it
> > is now a lot more likely for cached32_node to be anywhere in a "full"
> > 32-bit address space, and as such more likely for space to become
> > available from IOVAs below that node being freed.
> >
> > At this point, the short-cut in __cached_rbnode_delete_update() really
> > doesn't hold up any more, and we need to fix the logic to reliably
> > provide the expected behaviour. We still want cached32_node to only move
> > upwards, but we should reset the allocation size if *any* 32-bit space
> > has become available.
> >
> > Reported-by: Yunfei Wang <yf.wang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>
> Would you mind adding:
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Applied without stable tag for now. If needed, please consider
re-sending it for stable when this patch is merged upstream.
Regards,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-04 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 14:40 [PATCH] iommu/iova: Improve 32-bit free space estimate Robin Murphy
2022-03-03 23:08 ` Miles Chen
2022-03-03 23:36 ` Miles Chen
2022-03-04 9:41 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2022-03-04 11:32 ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-05 0:03 ` Miles Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YiHey3lGHAMUp+oC@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=yf.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox