From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA9BC433F5 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345540AbiCHKEK (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 05:04:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57036 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233810AbiCHKEJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 05:04:09 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BD213A5F1; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 02:03:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1646733793; x=1678269793; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=rtW+MFf0KlWKiIpC8eDfkdOzFdS5LxJYrRPmGTvHdMQ=; b=OgumAsFVukEtA8MwQ7H7ruhduo8ROs+w5NHv44YXQLjMnhNTyVRZP9cC N27eHBPQwAeR8MYRQWpV+ei0ZVlldV8bm2I3Icc76ft8otyRXFmWUhccl 54vGUgg0jCHy3FHr7UfGtRNbcpOjjtDS0ouoMgYSyTi+qSwGZBkdgEL2l ehnKQNZ+LYJqkPXXlMkR+FEOCNPadD7qsnJwf4ukJ8R+QvK27nM/5zlQi 18MAzkrXAcX5jBhjYk7pzaNUJ/1OwKTbw24/y5jFDBuYh7w6hsyS3qJQ6 O27LfEbMdNg9RbTnulXUFhbiID+Mr53dbsLA2YpffsQzr8LWHFZ6aOFVY g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10279"; a="341078001" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,164,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="341078001" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Mar 2022 02:03:12 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,164,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="577942049" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.59]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Mar 2022 02:03:11 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1nRWfj-00DHqA-EM; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 12:02:27 +0200 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:02:27 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: sim: fix a typo Message-ID: References: <20220308084627.214720-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220308084627.214720-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 09:46:27AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > Just noticed this when applying Andy's patch. s/childred/children/ Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko > Fixes: cb8c474e79be ("gpio: sim: new testing module") > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c > index bb9bb595c1a8..8e5d87984a48 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c > @@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ struct gpio_sim_bank { > * > * So we need to store the pointer to the parent struct here. We can > * dereference it anywhere we need with no checks and no locking as > - * it's guaranteed to survive the childred and protected by configfs > + * it's guaranteed to survive the children and protected by configfs > * locks. > * > * Same for other structures. > -- > 2.30.1 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko