From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84991C433EF for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347861AbiCHPhl (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:37:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344633AbiCHPhh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:37:37 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06E8E4E3A5; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 07:36:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id n31-20020a05600c3b9f00b003898fc06f1eso1635496wms.1; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:36:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=laPhZb1GwIvIq+5gAOz9hWbhVtuOoBLrm7z2JuFF6aA=; b=T1SixgEuD9tVWJjr6rq5qnWp0syZjQpRbdswyehuzTF7JcHTVPx7bxyTCdnvW71a2v gTse/eWpO/wmkS6MdfYXKL/0MexZ9MqOCvpRBKaw2uEYqc+U7xeuMO3iRoc86JzsKFzr 1qaALvyRSrrI2nAlxtktlDL1Oz+7wkCA0ikuBw2Ojpvy3/yy4TR5LToKQ5zrNu40pZ0U l7pf2OY5cg/b75OYufufPZm+vIAVR6WnxgJB3WC61krYoxO8rePGTtE0z4iTKuKaRoY3 hpbtoakhJ1YzSSZyHXRdqIXppNexyy/l4l0GWTUH+B2BDiZrrMB/1DgBTYEsCFz54rQR dGrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=laPhZb1GwIvIq+5gAOz9hWbhVtuOoBLrm7z2JuFF6aA=; b=Wd+izYW769o6GcWINc8v7ICRgULFtqtG7I9Z0FVNtVTJfsejQ2lEzmhtUq281iodLK z7PjBXO57Tewg2VFZNbHhicv96eeOMLF/F+/REhuAn48ALTjV6aXonqmkGy+p1bcPGKf WnGAel7GT7kvG2z/6i6jdiFfgpobRPqjiYtPLMgMJCzCQyvTihB5US8uCi+xh9+FdLc4 vO+T0qbCUMLi1x5WI3PuV64B6W9pxPynuEDWzejmZRMYhSaWm+VIO/kuue3wjS78ISTr 2gV0ext0zXeLg3vywCsveNlHy1LQDRD/tc/TGUV2yo9RsI06V2ZiKbu8shMI+TTobKTO MF0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530sxJlktKtFCZa7uH6s69iqXOqJVjRCMdMMWEJ6teRdj11qtLmr mg399DIwgJYFLV8/T3azezc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwfXxCQcYo6qvjP5pSM4c29YqxfMnjOw01pRWnv9k1CnTApdnCkzSPYidNpZR78KgiOpsK8rw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:384a:b0:37c:2d14:a2d3 with SMTP id s10-20020a05600c384a00b0037c2d14a2d3mr4133027wmr.20.1646753799459; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:36:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-78-145-97-89.as13285.net. [78.145.97.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o22-20020a05600c4fd600b0038133076dcesm2996473wmq.16.2022.03.08.07.36.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:36:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:36:36 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/256] 5.15.27-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220307162207.188028559@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220307162207.188028559@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:28:50PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.27 release. > There are 256 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Mar 2022 16:21:31 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 62 configs -> 3 failures arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220301): 4 configs -> no failure Mips failures, allmodconfig, gpr_defconfig and mtx1_defconfig fails with: ./arch/mips/include/asm/asm.h:68: warning: "END" redefined 68 | #define END(function) \ | In file included from drivers/net/slip/slip.c:88: drivers/net/slip/slip.h:44: note: this is the location of the previous definition 44 | #define END 0300 /* indicates end of frame */ | drivers/net/slip/slip.c: In function 'slip_esc': drivers/net/slip/slip.c:930:18: error: 'END' undeclared (first use in this function) 930 | *ptr++ = END; | ^~~ drivers/net/slip/slip.c:930:18: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in drivers/net/slip/slip.c: In function 'slip_unesc': drivers/net/slip/slip.c:960:14: error: 'END' undeclared (first use in this function) 960 | case END: | ^~~ drivers/net/slip/slip.c: In function 'sl_outfill': drivers/net/slip/slip.c:1393:75: error: 'END' undeclared (first use in this function) 1393 | unsigned char s = (sl->mode & SL_MODE_SLIP6)?0x70:END; Test was on top of 7b9aacd770fa ("Linux 5.15.27-rc2"). Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/851 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/855 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/856 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip ./arch/mips/include/asm/asm.h:68: error: "END" redefined [-Werror] 68 | #define END(function) \