From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ns: Move MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL to ns_common.h, reuse it
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 17:12:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yj3p6etC9Wr/gvr5@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220325153714.eau4ja6pcr2a34sh@wittgenstein>
Hi all,
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:21:27PM +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Move MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL to ns_common.h and reuse it in check in
> > user_namespace.c.
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> > ---
> > Hi Christian, all,
> > I don't see putting MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL into ns_common.h as an elegant
> > solution but IMHO better than use a hardwired number or redefinition in
> > user_namespace.h.
> Hey Petr,
> Weird I either deleted that message by accident or didn't get it.
Interesting. BTW I didn't get any bounce suggesting mail to you didn't arrive.
> > Kind regards,
> > Petr
> > include/linux/ns_common.h | 3 +++
> > include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 3 ---
> > kernel/user_namespace.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ns_common.h b/include/linux/ns_common.h
> > index 0f1d024bd958..173fab9dadf7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ns_common.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ns_common.h
> > @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@
> > #include <linux/refcount.h>
> > +/* MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL is needed for limiting size of 'struct pid' */
> > +#define MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL 32
> The only two namespaces where this applies to have the same hard-coded
> limit. If you want to get rid of the raw number you should just
> introduce a generic define that expresses the limit for both pidns
> and userns. Using "MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL" in the userns case is very
> confusing. So if you wanted to do this introducing something like
> #define MAX_NS_LEVEL 32
> and using it in both places makes more sense.
Thanks a lot, I overlooked they aren't related.
I wonder if there should be just one constant for both (i.e. MAX_NS_LEVEL) as
you suggest, 2 constants, i.e keep MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL and add MAX_USER_NS_LEVEL
(which happen to be both 32).
Also understand if you prefer just to keep the raw number (MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL has
more use than just a single place, but user namespaces need it just on single
place).
Kind regards,
Petr
> Christian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-25 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-25 11:21 [PATCH 1/1] ns: Move MAX_PID_NS_LEVEL to ns_common.h, reuse it Petr Vorel
2022-03-25 13:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-03-25 16:04 ` Petr Vorel
2022-03-25 15:37 ` Christian Brauner
2022-03-25 16:12 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yj3p6etC9Wr/gvr5@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox