From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86: Event/exception fixes and cleanups
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 23:02:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yj5KCqtu7KZiGtgN@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e64d9972-339c-c661-afbd-38f1f2ea476a@maciej.szmigiero.name>
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> So, what's the plan here: is your patch set Sean considered to supersede
> Maxim's earlier proposed changes or will you post an updated patch set
> incorporating at least some of them?
Next step is to reach a consensus on how we want to solve the problem (or if we
can't reach consensus, until Paolo uses his special powers). I definitely won't
post anything new until there's more conversation.
> I am asking because I have a series that touches the same general area
> of KVM [1] and would preferably have it based on the final form of the
> event injection code to avoid unforeseen negative interactions between
> these changes.
I don't think you need to do anything, at a glance your changes are orthogonal
even though they have similar themes. Any conflicts should be minor.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-25 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 3:27 [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86: Event/exception fixes and cleanups Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 01/21] KVM: x86: Return immediately from x86_emulate_instruction() on code #DB Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 02/21] KVM: nVMX: Unconditionally purge queued/injected events on nested "exit" Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 03/21] KVM: VMX: Drop bits 31:16 when shoving exception error code into VMCS Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 04/21] KVM: x86: Don't check for code breakpoints when emulating on exception Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 05/21] KVM: nVMX: Treat General Detect #DB (DR7.GD=1) as fault-like Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 06/21] KVM: nVMX: Prioritize TSS T-flag #DBs over Monitor Trap Flag Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 07/21] KVM: x86: Treat #DBs from the emulator as fault-like (code and DR7.GD=1) Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 08/21] KVM: x86: Use DR7_GD macro instead of open coding check in emulator Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 09/21] KVM: nVMX: Ignore SIPI that arrives in L2 when vCPU is not in WFS Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 10/21] KVM: nVMX: Unconditionally clear mtf_pending on nested VM-Exit Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 11/21] KVM: VMX: Inject #PF on ENCLS as "emulated" #PF Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 12/21] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_x86_ops.queue_exception to inject_exception Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 13/21] KVM: x86: Make kvm_queued_exception a properly named, visible struct Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 14/21] KVM: x86: Formalize blocking of nested pending exceptions Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 15/21] KVM: x86: Use kvm_queue_exception_e() to queue #DF Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 16/21] KVM: x86: Hoist nested event checks above event injection logic Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 17/21] KVM: x86: Evaluate ability to inject SMI/NMI/IRQ after potential VM-Exit Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 18/21] KVM: x86: Morph pending exceptions to pending VM-Exits at queue time Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:27 ` [PATCH 19/21] KVM: VMX: Update MTF and ICEBP comments to document KVM's subtle behavior Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:28 ` [PATCH 20/21] KVM: selftests: Use uapi header to get VMX and SVM exit reasons/codes Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 3:28 ` [PATCH 21/21] KVM: selftests: Add an x86-only test to verify nested exception queueing Sean Christopherson
2022-03-11 16:30 ` [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86: Event/exception fixes and cleanups Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-13 9:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-24 21:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-25 21:25 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-25 23:02 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-03-26 0:21 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-27 15:06 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-28 17:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-29 10:45 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-03-29 15:43 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yj5KCqtu7KZiGtgN@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox