From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A31EC433EF for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347910AbiCOLOX (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 07:14:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47234 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347901AbiCOLOU (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 07:14:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3BE13D5E for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 04:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id qx21so40368580ejb.13 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 04:13:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4OxIW7ukQp7P+QJleA1PqcVNvNRyt/aT/5fuwLTzWVU=; b=jfkpCmWw7/mNZ/CdsE/GuHYvpPaiyCYopGGkyJ4701HvBg3G8Zs1yJRYw0qFXW4ahF XAOQARko7eCi10qPEeqeJGYatT4/9I5prWjq26Sp9g/whLm0mBi+cRmewSzQLts73zj7 p0VTJp2JOPik8kY3KYfWxZw+IKINTvLlI2TtkQI49YNIWkL96/aQOW7FuyLgLRVqoxfW pt4GYlvX5EAJdD+ADFAan8XCtutNeekz6GHZcULEDvWP/mzBHR6t1RSTHUvfiEOPUrNr ipKzE3T162GOQ+UNTNUBP/uHQfvsVAPisVEhTepsuU+L9QDHyq0eUYoqimdU7lFOStfL zkag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4OxIW7ukQp7P+QJleA1PqcVNvNRyt/aT/5fuwLTzWVU=; b=JdUOu4t3CBXnD8O35K+XaAEOPL31ZeU314vTtkEkcxyNLRU6RQn1oowbpinavLwDjY KyI6QQLMkJGAI4EAI5+e9RtnxsJ5pIqHOYBJ4CltVjbaTdLBCpqt4RlV2XlhNk7jfCKH Sd6z1CaNu3675Vbh886JGBs9hyifnZ1x1fGsiKgRb16xixG7mBTMX0HNsuq/l3iT9wWc 7kyILoM7XySL6qTzV3aJclY607xazKr7/auM8Uzrww3zRAyFojPE+/RozMzsYSNp3C+U v6/gopE4cNesMIi5cSriA49QMlzczo2TAp5ND7A4BjV3HDm7XKxIAeqtUb/5J/XBeSG2 jYXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Bz5YSEULMsQxiU/qwxqnIUEzr5OS6oY0OZeUVA5FwuWw5HHEm V+L5lziJUlldT5M9yL4PbP0cMA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmuBdQm+1qW/dhV+k/Km1tvvGFhijmm1a/GIGNPJ+IpzPgt6nj82uadH5TUtoNZvLIq0OEFw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2d93:b0:6db:ab5e:7e0b with SMTP id gt19-20020a1709072d9300b006dbab5e7e0bmr15990296ejc.262.1647342785923; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 04:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([86.61.181.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q2-20020a170906144200b006ceb8723de9sm7901281ejc.120.2022.03.15.04.13.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Mar 2022 04:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:13:04 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko To: Sun Shouxin Cc: j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org, oliver@neukum.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, huyd12@chinatelecom.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] net:bonding:Add support for IPV6 RLB to balance-alb mode Message-ID: References: <20220315073008.17441-1-sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn> <20220315073008.17441-4-sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220315073008.17441-4-sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:30:07AM CET, sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn wrote: >This patch is implementing IPV6 RLB for balance-alb mode. Out of curiosity, what is exactly your usecase? I'm asking because I don't see any good reason to use RLB/ALB modes. I have to be missing something.