From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
"open list:THUNDERBOLT DRIVER" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] thunderbolt: Automatically authorize PCIe tunnels when IOMMU is active
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:30:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjGD7N++F+ioISHb@lahna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220315213008.5357-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Hi Mario,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:30:08PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Historically TBT3 in Linux used "Thunderbolt security levels" as a primary
> means of "security" against DMA attacks. This mean that users would need to
> ack any device plugged in via userspace. In ~2018 machines started to use
> the IOMMU for protection, but instead of dropping security levels a
> convoluted flow was introduced:
> * User hotplugs device
> * Driver discovers supported tunnels
> * Driver emits a uevent to userspace that a PCIe tunnel is present
> * Userspace reads 'iommu_dma_protection' attribute (which currently
> indicates an Intel IOMMU is present and was enabled pre-boot not that
> it's active "now")
> * Based on that value userspace then authorizes automatically or prompts
> the user like how security level based support worked.
There are legitimate reasons to disable PCIe tunneling even if the IOMMU
bits are in place. The ACPI _OSC allows the boot firmware to do so and
our "security levels" allows the userspace policy to do the same. I
would not like to change that unless absolutely necessary.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-16 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 21:30 [RFC] thunderbolt: Automatically authorize PCIe tunnels when IOMMU is active Mario Limonciello
2022-03-16 6:30 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2022-03-16 13:06 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-03-16 13:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-03-16 13:48 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-03-16 14:39 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-03-16 14:56 ` Limonciello, Mario
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjGD7N++F+ioISHb@lahna \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=YehezkelShB@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox