From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91362C433F5 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351357AbiCPH0X (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 03:26:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45466 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242653AbiCPH0V (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 03:26:21 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C0B5F8DE for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id r10so1641120wrp.3 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:25:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=8BgdaLCDN6ytbgA7o8PQn3N09wAKTlqYsotJMbZ94HQ=; b=t7PLX2bnFJvh2OuH8ldQ3pGj0uGpLjvI9yGGDUiqTDd7SSumcM4cnuTcNRyMpaRwAC h5HtFuQ/ZdMrdt2qM+73TPfgoqxj+IcVeFIA256djzYWu7ghKi5saQi0lFK3vl71MPD1 02oa4G8StCr3dhefjZqhhiTuzY/JBONjGDmZTPnsxwlf2yb1U/mztbaxUu2ndWHRXc7q +WWXFgf4jFI/4r3oUahqOe+JpxT03Ep9hmPGg3S83ztNt8A2YPQqgPIjE09lYpOjIBT9 4GMdGjAX1+hIFKtm0KnIyuYypZghIOV5P6DTbMmIVJ5HufNysqVkMaEI/nklElepRLn4 Edaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=8BgdaLCDN6ytbgA7o8PQn3N09wAKTlqYsotJMbZ94HQ=; b=jSFnaP/DYpdeAN8406KXso4YkVPOo48ncm3EQj5U56EmOUMHyyYhIWiy3h5fZOxdVO hcuYAjMQQkQIYl8KJKLHhjZRitU4s3BUysIOR1LgJdj7+l11jGI2w91O47VMu50B8pHx DggmAHcIWQ0ca/LxCpuFjjm8BmtjWYKvfDnkVKz1WbQxvob8gHqsK/BI2O0+OvbkX8D0 tv712SligXUNaJ9V5v30cRKkU2LO64ceGs9k62WiR0tQMi0j335PBN9u06Jgwwi6ONb8 HHIu5bnIvW24E7iZvXBW1YksGlyP/Pgn9IBdl9JJjXh0SjevxZHluJGGH1FFW5imluzS Klzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uYKl6wiUxNu+AYil7MrHGtxglIWh6RWaCxwGN7FHrU8P4OD5s 3BaaLRKiSQyFH7gXdj+vTqY/yw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUBkwggjNof9CJhQ+Bfj+6ZOtK4GoDq5/024E6T6MIY1EyUUZpVIGGx2JSQ6fwq8YH99lWww== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e38f:0:b0:1f0:3383:77d9 with SMTP id e15-20020adfe38f000000b001f0338377d9mr22651010wrm.599.1647415504002; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (cpc155339-bagu17-2-0-cust87.1-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.27.177.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p14-20020a5d59ae000000b00203dcc87d39sm1559468wrr.54.2022.03.16.00.25.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:25:01 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Benson Leung , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck , Douglas Anderson , Craig Hesling , Tom Hughes , Alexandru M Stan Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ChromeOS fingerprint binding Message-ID: References: <20220314232214.4183078-1-swboyd@chromium.org> <20220314232214.4183078-2-swboyd@chromium.org> <9ec3c26a-3b85-4bea-5a5b-de9ac570cfca@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Lee Jones (2022-03-15 08:48:08) > > On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > Quoting Lee Jones (2022-03-15 04:30:49) > > > > It's tough to say from what I was sent above. > > > > > > > > But yes, sounds like it. > > > > > > > > We do not want any device 'functionality' in MFD ideally. > > > > > > > > > > I put it next to the existing cros-ec binding. The existing binding is > > > there because of historical reasons as far as I know. Otherwise it > > > didn't seem MFD related so I didn't Cc mfd maintainer/list. New file > > > additions don't usually conflict with anything and this is in the > > > bindings directory so the driver side maintainer would be picking up the > > > binding. > > > > That's not how it works unfortunately. > > > > This file is located in the MFD bindings directory, so I would be > > picking it up (if it ends up staying here). > > The way it works is arbitrary Correct. > and up to maintainer's choice. Which *should* be reflected in MAINTAINERS and by extension get_maintainer.pl. As is the case here. :) > I'll move it out of the mfd directory :) That does sound like a good solution, thanks Stephen. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog