public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: hui li <juanfengpy@gmail.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: discussing about proc_misc_d_delete
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 12:54:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjMFTSKZp9eX/c4k@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPmgiUJVaACDyWkEhpC5Tfk233t-Tw6_f-Y99KLUDqv6dEq0tw@mail.gmail.com>

	[cc linux-kernel ]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:54:37AM +0800, hui li wrote:
> We noticed that, commit 1da4d377f94 (“proc: revalidate misc dentries”)
> introduced proc_misc_dentry_ops as default ops for /proc dentry,
> dentry ops for /proc/pid/net/stat/ is set as proc_net_dentry_ops,
> which will revalidate dentry each time when this path is resolved and
> dentry for the stat file is removed from dcache. This time, if files
> under /proc/pid/net/stat/ are in use, then dentries of these files
> will be put in lru when closed, which is meanlingless,  as parrent
> dentry (stat) of these files are remove from dcache.
> 
> This can be reproduced when use linux command "while :;do du
> /proc/;done”, then refcount of each dentry of /proc/pid/net/stat/ will
> increase rapidly which should be deleted at once.

Are you worried that reference count can overflow? Those dentries will be
flushed eventually and reference count goes back to normal values.
This is easy to see with "echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches".

> I think this problem may by solved by checking whether parrent
> dentries are in d_cache inside proc_misc_d_delete, or set
> proc_misc_dentry_ops->d_delete = always_delete_dentry, just as what is
> used in kernel version 4.x and 3.x.
> --- a/fs/proc/generic.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,16 @@ static int proc_misc_d_revalidate(struct dentry
> *dentry, unsigned int flags)
> 
>  static int proc_misc_d_delete(const struct dentry *dentry)
>  {
> +       struct dentry *p;
> +       for (p = dentry->d_parent; !IS_ROOT(p); p = p->d_parent) {
> +               if (!spin_trylock(&p->d_lock))
> +                       break;
> +               if (unlikely(d_unhashed(p))){
> +                       spin_unlock(&p->d_lock);
> +                       return 1;
> +               }
> +               spin_unlock(&p->d_lock);
> +       }
>         return atomic_read(&PDE(d_inode(dentry))->in_use) < 0;
>  }

       reply	other threads:[~2022-03-17  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAPmgiUJVaACDyWkEhpC5Tfk233t-Tw6_f-Y99KLUDqv6dEq0tw@mail.gmail.com>
2022-03-17  9:54 ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2022-03-18  6:51   ` discussing about proc_misc_d_delete hui li
2022-03-20 16:23     ` [PATCH] proc: fix dentry/inode overinstantiating under /proc/${pid}/net Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-21  9:15       ` hui li
2022-03-21 10:40         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2022-03-21 11:50           ` cael

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YjMFTSKZp9eX/c4k@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=juanfengpy@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox