From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
jszhang@kernel.org, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] openrisc: Move to ticket-spinlock
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 13:10:08 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjlMIGKgYaLLpp5T@antec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJF2gTSFh0NKLys7kr=UdQWHDyYgg3XmgTJtVaL37Re7QdZ8uw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:29:13AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 7:23 AM Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 04:25:58PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > >
> > > We have no indications that openrisc meets the qspinlock requirements,
> > > so move to ticket-spinlock as that is more likey to be correct.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I have specifically not included Peter's SOB on this, as he sent his
> > > original patch
> > > <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YHbBBuVFNnI4kjj3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/>
> > > without one.
> > > ---
> > > arch/openrisc/Kconfig | 1 -
> > > arch/openrisc/include/asm/Kbuild | 5 ++---
> > > arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 3 +--
> > > arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 2 +-
> > > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This series breaks SMP support on OpenRISC. I haven't traced it down yet, it
> > seems trivial but I have a few places to check.
> >
> > I replied to this on a kbuild warning thread, but also going to reply here with
> > more information.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YjeY7CfaFKjr8IUc@antec/#R
> >
> > So far this is what I see:
> >
> > * ticket_lock is stuck trying to lock console_sem
> > * it is stuck on atomic_cond_read_acquire
> > reading lock value: returns 0 (*lock is 0x10000)
> > ticket value: is 1
> > * possible issues:
> > - OpenRISC is big endian, that seems to impact ticket_unlock, it looks
> All csky & riscv are little-endian, it seems the series has a bug with
> big-endian. Is that all right for qemu? (If qemu was all right, but
> real hardware failed.)
Hi Guo Ren,
OpenRISC real hardware and QEMU are both big-endian. It fails on both.
I replied on patch 1/5 with a suggested patch which fixes the issue for me.
Please have a look.
BTW. now I can look into the sparse warnings.
-Stafford
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-16 23:25 [PATCH 0/5] Generic Ticket Spinlocks Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] asm-generic: qspinlock: Indicate the use of mixed-size atomics Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-17 17:46 ` Waiman Long
2022-03-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] asm-generic: ticket-lock: New generic ticket-based spinlock Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-17 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-17 13:57 ` Boqun Feng
2022-03-17 15:03 ` Waiman Long
2022-03-17 15:34 ` Boqun Feng
2022-03-17 18:04 ` Waiman Long
2022-03-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] openrisc: Move to ticket-spinlock Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-17 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-21 21:29 ` Stafford Horne
2022-03-22 3:29 ` Guo Ren
2022-03-22 4:10 ` Stafford Horne [this message]
2022-03-22 6:45 ` Guo Ren
2022-03-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] RISC-V: Move to ticket-spinlocks Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-16 23:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: Move to queued RW locks Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-17 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-17 9:16 ` [PATCH 0/5] Generic Ticket Spinlocks Arnd Bergmann
2022-03-17 11:09 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-03-18 7:24 ` Guo Ren
2022-03-18 8:40 ` Guo Ren
2022-03-22 18:18 ` Conor Dooley
2022-03-22 20:02 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-03-22 20:19 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjlMIGKgYaLLpp5T@antec \
--to=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox