From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
nbd@other.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nbd: Don't use workqueue to handle recv work
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:11:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjotekJZcSvwoZhp@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211227091241.103-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com>
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:12:41PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> The rescuer thread might take over the works queued on
> the workqueue when the worker thread creation timed out.
> If this happens, we have no chance to create multiple
> recv threads which causes I/O hung on this nbd device.
>
> To fix it, we can not simply remove the WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
> flag since the recv work is in the memory reclaim path.
> So this patch tries to create kthreads directly to
> handle the recv work instead of using workqueue.
>
I still don't understand why we can't drop WQ_MEM_RECLAIM. IIRC your argument
is that we need it because a reconnect could happen under memory pressure and we
need to be able to queue work for that. However your code makes it so we're
just doing a kthread_create(), which isn't coming out of some emergency pool, so
it's just as likely to fail as a !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-27 9:12 [PATCH v2] nbd: Don't use workqueue to handle recv work Xie Yongji
2021-12-29 17:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-30 4:01 ` Yongji Xie
2022-01-03 16:10 ` Josef Bacik
2022-01-04 5:31 ` Yongji Xie
2022-01-04 18:06 ` Josef Bacik
2022-01-05 5:36 ` Yongji Xie
2022-01-21 8:34 ` Yongji Xie
2022-02-15 13:17 ` Yongji Xie
2022-02-18 15:20 ` Josef Bacik
2022-02-19 13:04 ` Yongji Xie
2022-03-22 8:10 ` Yongji Xie
2022-03-22 20:11 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2022-03-23 11:21 ` Yongji Xie
2022-05-16 6:13 ` Yongji Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjotekJZcSvwoZhp@localhost.localdomain \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox