From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 23:03:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yk4cOGC5/B6fKoJD@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e8f558d-c00a-7170-f671-bd10c0a56557@maciej.szmigiero.name>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 6.04.2022 22:52, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> > > Another option for saving and restoring a VM would be to add it to
> > > KVM_{GET,SET}_NESTED_STATE somewhere (maybe as a part of the saved VMCB12
> > > control area?).
> >
> > Ooh. What if we keep nested_run_pending=true until the injection completes? Then
> > we don't even need an extra flag because nested_run_pending effectively says that
> > any and all injected events are for L1=>L2. In KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE, shove the
> > to-be-injected event into the normal vmc*12 injection field, and ignore all
> > to-be-injected events in KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS if nested_run_pending=true.
> >
> > That should work even for migrating to an older KVM, as keeping nested_run_pending
> > will cause the target to reprocess the event injection as if it were from nested
> > VM-Enter, which it technically is.
>
> I guess here by "ignore all to-be-injected events in KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS" you
> mean *moving* back the L1 -> L2 event to be injected from KVM internal data
> structures like arch.nmi_injected (and so on) to the KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE-returned
> VMCB12 EVENTINJ field (or its VMX equivalent).
>
> But then the VMM will need to first call KVM_GET_NESTED_STATE (which will do
> the moving), only then KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS (which will then no longer show
> these events as pending).
> And their setters in the opposite order when restoring the VM.
I wasn't thinking of actually moving things in the source VM, only ignoring events
in KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS. Getting state shouldn't be destructive, e.g. the source VM
should still be able to continue running.
Ahahahaha, and actually looking at the code, there's this gem in KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS
/*
* The API doesn't provide the instruction length for software
* exceptions, so don't report them. As long as the guest RIP
* isn't advanced, we should expect to encounter the exception
* again.
*/
if (kvm_exception_is_soft(vcpu->arch.exception.nr)) {
events->exception.injected = 0;
events->exception.pending = 0;
}
and again for soft interrupts
events->interrupt.injected =
vcpu->arch.interrupt.injected && !vcpu->arch.interrupt.soft;
so through KVM's own incompetency, it's already doing half the work.
This is roughly what I had in mind. It will "require" moving nested_run_pending
to kvm_vcpu_arch, but I've been itching for an excuse to do that anyways.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index eb71727acecb..62c48f6a0815 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4846,6 +4846,8 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
{
+ bool drop_injected_events = vcpu->arch.nested_run_pending;
+
process_nmi(vcpu);
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu))
@@ -4872,7 +4874,8 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
* isn't advanced, we should expect to encounter the exception
* again.
*/
- if (kvm_exception_is_soft(vcpu->arch.exception.nr)) {
+ if (drop_injected_events ||
+ kvm_exception_is_soft(vcpu->arch.exception.nr)) {
events->exception.injected = 0;
events->exception.pending = 0;
} else {
@@ -4893,13 +4896,14 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
events->exception_has_payload = vcpu->arch.exception.has_payload;
events->exception_payload = vcpu->arch.exception.payload;
- events->interrupt.injected =
- vcpu->arch.interrupt.injected && !vcpu->arch.interrupt.soft;
+ events->interrupt.injected = vcpu->arch.interrupt.injected &&
+ !vcpu->arch.interrupt.soft &&
+ !drop_injected_events;
events->interrupt.nr = vcpu->arch.interrupt.nr;
events->interrupt.soft = 0;
events->interrupt.shadow = static_call(kvm_x86_get_interrupt_shadow)(vcpu);
- events->nmi.injected = vcpu->arch.nmi_injected;
+ events->nmi.injected = vcpu->arch.nmi_injected && !drop_injected_events;
events->nmi.pending = vcpu->arch.nmi_pending != 0;
events->nmi.masked = static_call(kvm_x86_get_nmi_mask)(vcpu);
events->nmi.pad = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-02 1:08 [PATCH 0/8] KVM: SVM: Fix soft int/ex re-injection Sean Christopherson
2022-04-02 1:08 ` [PATCH 1/8] KVM: nSVM: Sync next_rip field from vmcb12 to vmcb02 Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 9:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-04 16:50 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-04 17:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 17:45 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-20 15:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-20 15:05 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-20 16:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-20 16:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-20 16:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-02 1:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] KVM: SVM: Downgrade BUG_ON() to WARN_ON() in svm_inject_irq() Sean Christopherson
2022-04-02 1:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] KVM: SVM: Unwind "speculative" RIP advancement if INTn injection "fails" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 10:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-20 15:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-02 1:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] KVM: SVM: Stuff next_rip on emualted INT3 injection if NRIPS is supported Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 12:00 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-02 1:09 ` [PATCH 5/8] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INT3/INTO instead of retrying the instruction Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 12:12 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-04 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 16:53 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-04 19:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 19:50 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-04 19:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 20:46 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-04 20:44 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-06 1:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-06 13:13 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-06 17:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-06 19:08 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-06 19:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-06 20:30 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-06 20:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-06 22:34 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-06 23:03 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-04-07 15:32 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-02 1:09 ` [PATCH 6/8] KVM: SVM: Re-inject INTn instead of retrying the insn on "failure" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 17:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 20:27 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-04-02 1:09 ` [PATCH 7/8] KVM: x86: Trace re-injected exceptions Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 12:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-04 16:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-02 1:09 ` [PATCH 8/8] KVM: selftests: nSVM: Add svm_nested_soft_inject_test Sean Christopherson
2022-04-04 12:27 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-04-04 16:59 ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yk4cOGC5/B6fKoJD@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox