Re: [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86: Event/exception fixes and cleanups

Maciej S. Szmigiero
2022-03-26T00:22:34Z

On 26.03.2022 00:02, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> So, what's the plan here: is your patch set Sean considered to supersede
>> Maxim's earlier proposed changes or will you post an updated patch set
>> incorporating at least some of them?
>
> Next step is to reach a consensus on how we want to solve the problem (or if we
> can't reach consensus, until Paolo uses his special powers). I definitely won't
> post anything new until there's more conversation.

Ack.

>> I am asking because I have a series that touches the same general area
>> of KVM [1] and would preferably have it based on the final form of the
>> event injection code to avoid unforeseen negative interactions between
>> these changes.
>
> I don't think you need to do anything, at a glance your changes are orthogonal
> even though they have similar themes. Any conflicts should be minor.

All right - I will try to keep an eye on the developments related to the
event injection code just to be sure there are no obvious conflicts here.

Thanks,
Maciej