From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, dlatypov@google.com,
davidgow@google.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org,
cocci@inria.fr, smatch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: dev-tools: Add a section for static analysis tools
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 18:19:56 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkImfPbNOzQBq5ZD@marsc.168.1.7> (raw)
Complement the Kernel Testing Guide documentation page by adding a
section about static analysis tools.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
---
Hey everyone,
I think this patch can be a good addition to the documentation as
discussed in the thread for the testing guide documentation page:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/CABVgOS=2iYtqTVdxwH=mcFpcSuLP4cpJ4s6PKP4Gc-SH6jidgQ@mail.gmail.com/
If you think it would be worth it, I can try making something more
elaborated. Maybe provide some guidance on when to use each tool.
I've been studying how Linux device drivers are tested.
Here's a post I wrote talking about some testing tools.
Link: https://marcelosc.gitlab.io/how-is-linux-tested/
Best regards,
Marcelo
Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
index 65feb81edb14..b00511109a9d 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
@@ -115,3 +115,32 @@ that none of these errors are occurring during the test.
Some of these tools integrate with KUnit or kselftest and will
automatically fail tests if an issue is detected.
+Static Analysis Tools
+======================
+
+In addition to testing a running kernel, one may also scout for bugs by
+analyzing the source code semantics. Three tools are well known for serving this
+purpose.
+
+Sparse can help test the kernel by performing type-checking, lock checking,
+value range checking, in addition to reporting various errors and warnings while
+examining the code. See the Documentation/dev-tools/sparse.rst documentation
+page for details on how to use it.
+
+Smatch extends Sparse and provides additional checks for programming logic
+mistakes such as missing breaks in switch statements, unused return values on
+error checking, forgetting to set an error code in the return of an error path,
+etc. Smatch also has tests against more serious issues such as integer
+overflows, null pointer dereferences, and memory leaks. See the project page at
+http://smatch.sourceforge.net/.
+
+We also have Coccinelle as an option within static analyzers. Coccinelle is
+often used to aid collateral evolution of source code, but it can also help to
+avoid certain bugs that have been expressed semantically. The types of tests
+available include API tests, tests for correct usage of kernel iterators, checks
+for the soundness of free operations, analysis of locking behavior, and further
+tests known to help keep consistent kernel usage. See the
+Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst documentation page for details.
+
+These static analysis tools support running tests on the whole source tree or
+over a specific file or directory.
--
2.35.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 21:19 Marcelo Schmitt [this message]
2022-03-28 22:36 ` [PATCH] Documentation: dev-tools: Add a section for static analysis tools Shuah Khan
2022-03-28 22:37 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-03-29 9:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-29 9:24 ` [cocci] " Julia Lawall
2022-03-29 4:29 ` David Gow
2022-03-29 7:31 ` [cocci] " Julia Lawall
2022-03-29 9:09 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkImfPbNOzQBq5ZD@marsc.168.1.7 \
--to=marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=smatch@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox