public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
Cc: bharat@chelsio.com, jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, roland@purestorage.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, vipul@chelsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxgb4: cm: fix a incorrect NULL check on list iterator
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:53:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkRS0sImiTd+mhd3@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220330123027.25897-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 08:30:27PM +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 19:38:31 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 03:35:42PM +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> > > The bug is here:
> > > 	if (!pdev) {
> > > 
> > > The list iterator value 'pdev' will *always* be set and non-NULL
> > > by for_each_netdev(), so it is incorrect to assume that the
> > > iterator value will be NULL if the list is empty or no element
> > > found (in this case, the check 'if (!pdev)' can be bypassed as
> > > it always be false unexpectly).
> > > 
> > > To fix the bug, use a new variable 'iter' as the list iterator,
> > > while use the original variable 'pdev' as a dedicated pointer to
> > > point to the found element.
> > 
> > I don't think that the description is correct.
> > We are talking about loopback interface which received packet, the pdev will always exist.
> 
> Do the both conditions impossible?
> 1. the list is empty or
> 2. we can not found a pdev due to this check
> 	if (ipv6_chk_addr(&init_net,
>   			  (struct in6_addr *)peer_ip,
> 			  pdev, 1))
> 			  iter, 1))

Yes, both are impossible.

Thanks

> 
> > Most likely. the check of "if (!pdev)" is to catch impossible situation where IPV6 packet
> > was sent over loopback, but IPV6 is not enabled.
> 
> --
> Xiaomeng Tong

      reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-27  7:35 [PATCH] cxgb4: cm: fix a incorrect NULL check on list iterator Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-27 16:38 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-30 12:30   ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-30 12:53     ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YkRS0sImiTd+mhd3@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=bharat@chelsio.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@purestorage.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vipul@chelsio.com \
    --cc=xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox