public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Thiébaud Weksteen" <tweek@google.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Alistair Delva <adelva@google.com>,
	Adam Shih <adamshih@google.com>,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware_loader: use kernel credentials when reading firmware
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:33:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkqtZFuMpYxDBAH+@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220404054642.3095732-1-tweek@google.com>

On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 03:46:42PM +1000, Thiébaud Weksteen wrote:
> Device drivers may decide to not load firmware when probed to avoid
> slowing down the boot process should the firmware filesystem not be
> available yet. In this case, the firmware loading request may be done
> when a device file associated with the driver is first accessed. The
> credentials of the userspace process accessing the device file may be
> used to validate access to the firmware files requested by the driver.
> Ensure that the kernel assumes the responsibility of reading the
> firmware.
> 
> This was observed on Android for a graphic driver loading their firmware
> when the device file (e.g. /dev/mali0) was first opened by userspace
> (i.e. surfaceflinger). The security context of surfaceflinger was used
> to validate the access to the firmware file (e.g.
> /vendor/firmware/mali.bin).
> 
> Because previous configurations were relying on the userspace fallback
> mechanism, the security context of the userspace daemon (i.e. ueventd)
> was consistently used to read firmware files. More devices are found to
> use the command line argument firmware_class.path which gives the kernel
> the opportunity to read the firmware directly, hence surfacing this
> misattribution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thiébaud Weksteen <tweek@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/firmware_loader/main.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

Is this a bugfix?  if so, what commit does this fix?  If not, how has
this never been a problem in the past (i.e. what changed to cause
problems?)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-04  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-04  5:46 [PATCH] firmware_loader: use kernel credentials when reading firmware Thiébaud Weksteen
2022-04-04  8:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-04-05  2:23   ` Thiébaud Weksteen
2022-04-20 17:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-04-21 19:26 ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YkqtZFuMpYxDBAH+@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=adamshih@google.com \
    --cc=adelva@google.com \
    --cc=jeffv@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tweek@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox