From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Chun-Yi Lee <jlee@suse.com>,
stable@kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:40:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlzBlPWXWeg6ABen@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220415093735.74eusyuuboa32aqs@Rk>
On 04/15/22 at 05:37pm, Coiby Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 11:44:25AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 04/14/22 at 09:43am, Coiby Xu wrote:
> > > Currently there is no arch-specific implementation of
> > > arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig. Even if we want to add an implementation
> > > for an architecture in the future, we can simply use "(struct
> > > kexec_file_ops*)->verify_sig". So clean it up.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> > > Cc: stable@kernel.org
> >
> > It should be not worth noticing stable kernel that a clean up patch need
> > be back ported.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion! For the 2nd and 3rd patch, I'll add prerequisite
> info,
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 34d5960af253: kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
>
> and
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 34d5960af253: kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig
> Cc: stable@kernel.org # 83b7bb2d49ae: kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic
>
> respectively.
That sounds good, thx.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-18 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220414014344.228523-1-coxu@redhat.com>
2022-04-14 1:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] kexec: clean up arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 3:44 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-15 9:37 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 1:40 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2022-04-14 1:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 1:53 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 5:42 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 2:14 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-18 5:46 ` Coiby Xu
2022-04-14 1:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] kexec, KEYS, s390: Make use of built-in and secondary keyring for signature verification Coiby Xu
2022-04-18 2:11 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlzBlPWXWeg6ABen@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=coxu@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox