From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbaron@akamai.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, ardb@kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] jump_label,noinstr: Avoid instrumentation for JUMP_LABEL=n builds
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 15:25:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ym/buh8nDPFhohc2@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ym/X/BuXCi8H0vud@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:09PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Subject: jump_label,noinstr: Avoid instrumentation for JUMP_LABEL=n builds
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Mon May 2 12:30:20 CEST 2022
>
> When building x86_64 with JUMP_LABEL=n it's possible for
> instrumentation to sneak into noinstr:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: exit_to_user_mode+0x14: call to static_key_count.constprop.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x2d: call to static_key_count.constprop.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x1b: call to static_key_count.constprop.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> include/linux/jump_label.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
> @@ -256,9 +256,9 @@ extern void static_key_disable_cpuslocke
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> #include <linux/bug.h>
>
> -static inline int static_key_count(struct static_key *key)
> +static __always_inline int static_key_count(struct static_key *key)
> {
> - return atomic_read(&key->enabled);
> + return arch_atomic_read(&key->enabled.count);
Curious if this compiles - s/.count// ?
> }
>
> static __always_inline void jump_label_init(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-02 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-02 11:07 [PATCH 0/3] x86: Address various objtool complaints Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-02 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Mark __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable() as noreturn Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-02 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/cpu: Elide KCSAN for cpu_has() and friends Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-02 11:54 ` Marco Elver
2022-05-02 18:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-05-03 14:20 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-30 10:38 ` [tip: objtool/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-02 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] jump_label,noinstr: Avoid instrumentation for JUMP_LABEL=n builds Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-02 11:23 ` Marco Elver
2022-05-02 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-02 13:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-02 13:25 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2022-05-02 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ym/buh8nDPFhohc2@elver.google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox