Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] platform/x86: introduce p2sb_bar() helper

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>]

On Thu, 12 May 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 11:00:38AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 May 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 6:08 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > On 5/10/22 17:14, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > I must admit I have lost track of all the Ack-s / Reviewed-by-s a bit.
> > > >
> > > > So from the above I take it that the Ack-s resp. Reviewed-by-s on the
> > > > other non drivers/platform/x86 bits also signal an Ack to merge the entire
> > > > series through the pdx86 tree?
> > > >
> > > > Lee, any chance you can take a look at patches 3-5 and give your Ack
> > > > for merging these through the pdx86 tree together with the rest?
> > > 
> > > Actually I misinterpreted Lee's different tags again. Acked-by is
> > > normal for routing MFD code via other subsystems, while
> > > Acked-for-MFD-by is for Lee (scripts?) to route the code via MFD tree.
> > > Lee, is it the correct interpretation now?
> > 
> > Yes, that is correct.
> 
> Thanks for clarification. I'm learning hard way :-)
> 
> > I just replied to your 0th patch (before I saw this, sorry).
> 
> Thanks for the tag.
> 
> So, it seems we all set to route this via MFD then. Do you think we can go?
> Or do need to postpone this to be after v5.19-rc1?

I think Hans is correct.

I would like to see this soak before submitting directly to Mainline.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog