From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nitesh Lal <nilal@redhat.com>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alex Belits <abelits@belits.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Oscar Shiang <oscar0225@livemail.tw>
Subject: Re: [patch v12 13/13] task isolation: only TIF_TASK_ISOL if task isolation is enabled
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 16:12:21 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnF+lbxJXiQMbS/a@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zgk7x93h.ffs@tglx>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:45:54AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15 2022 at 12:31, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> $Subject does not qualify as a parseable sentence.
>
> > This avoids processing of TIF_TASK_ISOL, when returning to userspace,
> > for tasks which do not have task isolation configured.
>
> That's how kernel development works, right:
>
> 1) Add half baken stuff
> 2) Apply duct tape on top
>
> You know exactly, that this is _not_ the way it works.
>
> This whole thing is half thought out tinkerware with [ill|un]defined
> semantics.
It seems to be inline with the remaining TIF_ bits:
if (ti_work & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
+ if (ti_work & _TIF_TASK_ISOL)
+ task_isol_exit_to_user_mode();
+
And there is even:
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct thread_info {
#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED 3 /* rescheduling necessary */
#define TIF_SINGLESTEP 4 /* reenable singlestep on user return*/
#define TIF_SSBD 5 /* Speculative store bypass disable */
+#define TIF_TASK_ISOL 6 /* task isolation work pending */
#define TIF_SPEC_IB 9 /* Indirect branch speculation mitigation */
#define TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH 10 /* Flush L1D on mm switches (processes) */
#define TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY 11 /* notify kernel of userspace return */
So the purpose of TIF_TASK_ISOL is to condense in a single bit the
question: "is there task isolation work pending?"
By looking at the code, we see the sites where this bit is set are:
1) Task isolation configuration.
@@ -251,6 +257,11 @@ static int cfg_feat_quiesce_set(unsigned
info->quiesce_mask = i_qctrl->quiesce_mask;
info->oneshot_mask = i_qctrl->quiesce_oneshot_mask;
info->conf_mask |= ISOL_F_QUIESCE;
+
+ if ((info->active_mask & ISOL_F_QUIESCE) &&
+ (info->quiesce_mask & ISOL_F_QUIESCE_VMSTATS))
+ set_thread_flag(TIF_TASK_ISOL);
+
ret = 0;
2) copy_process (clone / fork):
@@ -303,6 +314,7 @@ int __copy_task_isol(struct task_struct
new_info->active_mask = info->active_mask;
tsk->task_isol_info = new_info;
+ set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(tsk), TIF_TASK_ISOL);
return 0;
}
3) task isolation activation:
@@ -330,6 +342,10 @@ int prctl_task_isol_activate_set(unsigne
info->active_mask = active_mask;
ret = 0;
+ if ((info->active_mask & ISOL_F_QUIESCE) &&
+ (info->quiesce_mask & ISOL_F_QUIESCE_VMSTATS))
+ set_thread_flag(TIF_TASK_ISOL);
+
out:
return ret;
Would you prefer an explanation, in words, when these bits are set, when
they are cleared?
So the meaning is:
+#define TIF_TASK_ISOL 6 /* task isolation work pending */
And the definition is "task isolation work" depends on what task
isolation features are implemented.
(honestly, seem pretty clear to me, but willing to improve...).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-03 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-15 15:31 [patch v12 00/13] extensible prctl task isolation interface and vmstat sync Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 01/13] s390: add support for TIF_TASK_ISOL Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 02/13] x86: " Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 03/13] add basic task isolation prctl interface Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 22:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 04/13] add prctl task isolation prctl docs and samples Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-26 0:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 05/13] task isolation: sync vmstats on return to userspace Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 23:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-27 6:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 06/13] procfs: add per-pid task isolation state Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 23:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 07/13] task isolation: sync vmstats conditional on changes Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-17 14:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-04-27 8:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 08/13] task isolation: enable return to userspace processing Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 09/13] task isolation: add preempt notifier to sync per-CPU vmstat dirty info to thread info Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-16 2:41 ` Oscar Shiang
2022-04-27 7:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-27 12:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-04 16:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 17:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 10/13] KVM: x86: process isolation work from VM-entry code path Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 11/13] mm: vmstat: move need_update Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 12/13] mm: vmstat_refresh: avoid queueing work item if cpu stats are clean Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-27 7:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-03 19:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-03-15 15:31 ` [patch v12 13/13] task isolation: only TIF_TASK_ISOL if task isolation is enabled Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-27 7:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-03 19:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2022-05-04 13:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-17 15:08 ` [patch v12 00/13] extensible prctl task isolation interface and vmstat sync Frederic Weisbecker
2022-04-25 16:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-25 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-03 18:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-04-27 9:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2022-05-03 18:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 13:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-04 18:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 20:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-05 16:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-06-01 16:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-05-04 17:01 ` Tim Chen
2022-05-04 20:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnF+lbxJXiQMbS/a@fuller.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=abelits@belits.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilal@redhat.com \
--cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
--cc=oscar0225@livemail.tw \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox