From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>, Guohanjun <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 4/7] arm64: add copy_{to, from}_user to machine check safe
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 11:26:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnJU4NIrJmHLawgk@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420030418.3189040-5-tongtiangen@huawei.com>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:04:15AM +0000, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> Add copy_{to, from}_user() to machine check safe.
>
> If copy fail due to hardware memory error, only the relevant processes are
> affected, so killing the user process and isolate the user page with
> hardware memory errors is a more reasonable choice than kernel panic.
Just to make sure I understand - we can only recover if the fault is in
a user page. That is, for a copy_from_user(), we can only handle the
faults in the source address, not the destination.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> index 34e317907524..480cc5ac0a8d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
> .endm
>
> .macro strb1 reg, ptr, val
> - strb \reg, [\ptr], \val
> + USER_MC(9998f, strb \reg, [\ptr], \val)
> .endm
So if I got the above correctly, why do we need an exception table entry
for the store to the kernel address?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-04 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 3:04 [PATCH -next v4 0/7]arm64: add machine check safe support Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 1/7] x86, powerpc: fix function define in copy_mc_to_user Tong Tiangen
2022-04-22 9:45 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-24 1:16 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-02 14:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-03 1:06 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05 1:21 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 2/7] arm64: fix types in copy_highpage() Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 3/7] arm64: add support for machine check error safe Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:26 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 6:29 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-25 8:30 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26 3:36 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-26 9:50 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-27 1:40 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 4/7] arm64: add copy_{to, from}_user to machine check safe Tong Tiangen
2022-05-04 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-05-05 6:39 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05 13:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05 14:33 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:31 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 6:53 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 5/7] arm64: mte: Clean up user tag accessors Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:36 ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 6/7] arm64: add {get, put}_user to machine check safe Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 7:09 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 7/7] arm64: add cow " Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:44 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 10:38 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-27 9:09 ` [PATCH -next v4 0/7]arm64: add machine check safe support Tong Tiangen
2022-05-04 19:58 ` (subset) " Catalin Marinas
2022-05-16 18:45 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnJU4NIrJmHLawgk@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox