From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: warn about flushing system-wide workqueues
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 07:32:37 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnQKNea6KWFaWNis@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <738afe71-2983-05d5-f0fc-d94efbdf7634@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Hello,
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 10:42:19PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Tejun, can we use this approach? If yes, when to apply?
>
> If we can include this patch into 5.18, can be applied as-is.
> If we can include this patch into 5.19, can be applied with checks for
> system_{long,unbound,highpri}_wq added because all flush_workqueue() users
> on system_*_wq are gone in next-20220505.
>
> Now that all flush_workqueue() users on system_*_wq are gone in next-20220505,
> next step is to remove all flush_scheduled_work() users. Therefore, instead of
> using /\bflush_workqueue\s*\(\s*system(_\w*)?_wq\s*\)/ in scripts/checkpatch.pl ,
> I think we can ask BUILD_BUG_ON() for blocking new system_*_wq users, and ask
> scripts/checkpatch.pl for blocking new system_wq users.
Given that we'll need runtime check anyway, why not resurrect the original
runtime warning but exempt flush_schedule_work() if that's the only thing
remaining right now (using a special flag or whatever)? If we're sure that
we aren't triggering it spuriously, we can ask Andrew to take the warning
patch into -mm so that it floats on top of everything else and gets pulled
into the trunk during the coming merge window.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-05 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-24 23:31 [PATCH] checkpatch: warn about flushing system-wide workqueues Tetsuo Handa
2022-04-24 23:45 ` Joe Perches
2022-04-25 0:33 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-05 13:42 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-05 15:48 ` Joe Perches
2022-05-05 17:32 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2022-05-05 23:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-12 16:46 ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-16 1:32 ` [PATCH v2] workqueue: Wrap flush_workqueue() using a macro Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-16 5:00 ` [PATCH v3] " Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-16 7:18 ` Joe Perches
2022-05-16 8:34 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-05-20 8:01 ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-20 9:51 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-20 11:11 ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-20 11:43 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-20 17:10 ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-21 1:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-21 4:57 ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-21 11:37 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-23 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2022-05-24 10:51 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-05-27 6:21 ` [PATCH v4] workqueue: Wrap flush_workqueue() using an inline function Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnQKNea6KWFaWNis@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox