From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1297C433EF for ; Thu, 5 May 2022 22:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1386353AbiEEWhz (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2022 18:37:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53402 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231488AbiEEWhx (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2022 18:37:53 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f182.google.com (mail-oi1-f182.google.com [209.85.167.182]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FB045DBF5; Thu, 5 May 2022 15:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-f182.google.com with SMTP id l16so5811153oil.6; Thu, 05 May 2022 15:34:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8+Gp8y6AxYwsLaD1GmNXpXLFzoVgQnSYTYyRgrz67PQ=; b=IW0PDxUcTpf4yNSmyMKMX7/PkXoOPks5kmzS1NDw4czCgRjkqTftWk7wINAdCq9cE9 Fh/38ksqt2lYhF0Fa7oTYGf/7t7LCA8TmsRYJlUCfHqObilC7L3Pc0CsRhfr7Jogzwr6 3kzqGjtnqPrhhCLh+l8t9zjVTWkYniaNXHE3dknnONNX/j18/m+e6UVnsAbfKedSE977 S2SY0la5wGDhmYqwURTxbovgJ6zMooN8M7i0fn+Anqwj2apk/+tujsP2cABllQrj9KyO Kdm06hYIBUq0JCCwnz82TXBSCQSwAQDrMylU51pCMymBjMsMAGx+cJSvQR6AYbAliUle PwwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LoqalkMEnQZtEy3UsrIElEAXoNGfzrye4R4WKF2PRHcAG5TAS 02X7pIaHXWVWVOt1a6+U5Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwk/3PSlCYefmrHUoAVQxOOHyS1icmf4PYkQDgH+ehi0kExi085swYRKdAwFVklmawPVf/pZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1710:b0:2f9:6c36:70cd with SMTP id bc16-20020a056808171000b002f96c3670cdmr195020oib.299.1651790052506; Thu, 05 May 2022 15:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-144-107.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.144.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c6-20020a0568301ae600b0060603221238sm1072314otd.8.2022.05.05.15.34.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 May 2022 15:34:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 319908 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 05 May 2022 22:34:11 -0000 Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 17:34:11 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Qin Jian Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards Message-ID: References: <20220505064430.124657-1-qinjian@cqplus1.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220505064430.124657-1-qinjian@cqplus1.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Qin Jian wrote: > This introduces bindings for boards based Sunplus SP7021 SoC. > > This patch is separated from the patch series: > Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support. [1] > To simply thing, I extract it from the original and resend this patch. This information doesn't belong in the commit msg. You should put context like this below the '---'. Who suggested splitting this out? Normally, new SoC families series are applied as a whole by the SoC maintainers (Arnd/Olof). Rob