Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: clock: Add support for IPQ8074 APSS clock controller

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 10:45:22PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2022 at 22:08, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:56:01PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote:
> > > Add dt-binding for the IPQ8074 APSS clock controller which provides
> > > clocks to the CPU cores.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > * Correct subject
> > > ---
> > >  include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..df07766b0146
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq8074.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >
> > Dual license please.
> 
> Hi Rob,
> Krzysztof asked about this in v1, I have derived this off IPQ6018
> binding which is marked GPL-2.0.
> So, I was not sure if it was appropriate to mark it as GPL/BSD dual license.
> If you say that its not an issue to dual-license, I will gladly do it.

Technically, you should maintain it, but I don't think 2 defines is 
really enough to represent copyrightable work (but IANAL). I also know 
that QCom prefers the DT stuff to be dual licensed because they've 
raised the issue with me. 

Rob