From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF6EC433FE for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 22:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231753AbiEIWkQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 18:40:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42306 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229532AbiEIWkM (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2022 18:40:12 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com (mail-oi1-f171.google.com [209.85.167.171]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A84781F2D4F; Mon, 9 May 2022 15:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id v65so16757295oig.10; Mon, 09 May 2022 15:36:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=c1M6wqhWWv3BpYBqrk6no0d2EvsycYmqX1VGhpzRGEI=; b=tqDFTe1O9Ipx9pNZMMfm86YT87caCTcNfyt6zeoVAYmHFp0EMeLBRdEjacoHQLUJN1 +HxNkdP0K137pXAse6EyH8XXL7PCiF+qhep6eoeGSKqMHfmqj+FoWQ7sCoxfMz9zzhQ4 bsIj2QmFyurMaazleqY+eNYk6Uu7+BFMGQmgZc9slRbQgQzpmAu9EU0229lQk+XmoTvn T3BmWQNY4oggXk6hkCi1zxeNsTeHH+3GFW6rjiVMlAiB2DrLEmeznH7mLxbi0s+vTlhq zXQGaJYNIBLdfsoj+IYSfd2Qy83IWxy8kKhWhRvUxHnTBGtFo/DHtGow/t3g08lTUVYv whAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+p/U9lCHNtPeL+diDmG277dx6wVrBZrGABcS6n0qW92Q3izbT 4itqtKfTqekF+IYuZJ4zAg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSvKg6NdOMWBJFDdtLoIBBQirxE56XmsbpySMSeXjq7HMZUZDlUFltYh7Kr/XklHJvznIbgg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:11c4:b0:2d9:c395:f15e with SMTP id p4-20020a05680811c400b002d9c395f15emr11975287oiv.47.1652135776986; Mon, 09 May 2022 15:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (66-90-144-107.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [66.90.144.107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g4-20020a9d6184000000b0060603221250sm5139319otk.32.2022.05.09.15.36.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 May 2022 15:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 335215 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 09 May 2022 22:36:15 -0000 Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 17:36:15 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Miles Chen Cc: allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, chun-jie.chen@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ikjn@chromium.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, matthias.bgg@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Remove msdc binding of mt8192 clock Message-ID: References: <20220505053111.13924-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220505053111.13924-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 01:31:11PM +0800, Miles Chen wrote: > Hi Rob, > > >> From: Matthias Brugger > >> > >> The msdc gate is part of the MMC driver. Delete the binding description > >> of this node. > > > >An ABI break is okay because ...? > > Sorry for that, > > If the mediatek,mt8192-msdc part is removed from the driver, That's an ABI break too. You just need to explain why as Matthias did in the commit message if the ABI break is okay. > Is it ok to keep "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" in the binding document? or > we should add '# deprecated' to "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" and keep the example. We do that sometimes, but depends on the situation. Rob