From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C3FC433F5 for ; Tue, 17 May 2022 10:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344809AbiEQK7o (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2022 06:59:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59946 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344899AbiEQK7Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 May 2022 06:59:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 769774B418; Tue, 17 May 2022 03:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id v191-20020a1cacc8000000b00397001398c0so1141376wme.5; Tue, 17 May 2022 03:58:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TC0kU0kx+y+RWbBCqsAsP+HQ3aEjY5q2DVAO89IeC9s=; b=FA5r+NX/lZ6cGo1t613iezlHCeUvETSbCJt0C6O1VgaCyU6YyuylO+cyX6HtRu1R0N SAFWjtumDwvnU421Jv1/jdQuDnIQ7rbne9UuXWX1ATR4Sh45j/9b7uPVbkrkd8n24XZP DAKx+h271EWgpWbniGbSgCUSJe1mhmJXMkAETQjgDja55vjd4xxIwhRTYAhxMSQqsFCK +x64/icFr+/F4THXp7Vo6KBhiac54xeCWr6c23hACEpZbjtJS41fff4++cLP8L6tUMB6 bvOIAkSA2VYMEVtZWWTV8K6MvLkTQqwEQLgBxy4V0JVrhH+qutsXTxOYoxiMcD+BmirV V+4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=TC0kU0kx+y+RWbBCqsAsP+HQ3aEjY5q2DVAO89IeC9s=; b=2BmtYCq3DGQVGIbzwBFk16GtHmu01o+ccyTZt9cLyXMEwUDVhrsR6CYlZ3iAV3njwH lL2PIvJOAoSlJxuQfeH7NDzteN9HIGQTVUcgY/lqsEXMM4ps1eDUY5XVWPGxkcjyyxdv CUDy/zVP1bMAF4f/acUOk0dO+UEUISXIWSky9FHhG9+Ypz6e2nLhHJz5vGscfKDps91T /a4NOvJ8dbz3tMIJ1R/4RYxWu2GmPIMLCtHIDJgv9A00LhtHQLfbcUik7U5mJkzPFrB9 k92MSohigysX4Rp3MZ454/1+wFAMaNxwOjv/oXVlTb34qn4hS2qrzTkvvQvD0Pietfd2 wXFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530fB7WLOYagCWxsFsOQXaCtI5mYifRR+xFqPKRpn3eKpyClAZxb TLpCBb5xGPVIQ029TEKoNipo0hxgrOU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxr+0d+xg6WXoTCcA+d7OTzh/bY9pK52Mpf6fsQ2xUBaC9j4joKbBWfLuzJKShLqdcTx65yNw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1d18:b0:394:6469:abec with SMTP id l24-20020a05600c1d1800b003946469abecmr20876498wms.89.1652785131942; Tue, 17 May 2022 03:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-2-98-37-191.as13285.net. [2.98.37.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j8-20020a05600c1c0800b003958af7d0c8sm1584389wms.45.2022.05.17.03.58.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 May 2022 03:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 11:58:49 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/32] 4.19.244-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220516193614.773450018@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220516193614.773450018@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:36:14PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.244 release. > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 May 2022 19:36:02 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 12.1.0): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 12.1.0): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 12.1.0): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 12.1.0): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1154 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip