From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] printk: console: Allow each console to have its own loglevel
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 17:25:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoZhXe9CZE5o73fG@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YoZdVCfK4T8Ts2oS@chrisdown.name>
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 04:08:04PM +0100, Chris Down wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> > > struct console {
> > > char name[16];
> > > void (*write)(struct console *, const char *, unsigned);
> > > @@ -179,9 +173,11 @@ struct console {
> > > void *data;
> > > struct console *next;
> > > int level;
> > > - struct device classdev;
> > > + struct device *classdev;
> >
> > Ick, no, keep the real structure here. It can properly handle the
> > reference counting for the object. Just correctly clean up in the
> > release function, not anywhere else.
>
> Sorry, I'm getting more and more confused about what you're asking me to do,
> and less and less clear on the rationale.
>
> Can you please clarify what "correctly cleaning up" would mean for a
> non-pointer `struct device'?
>
> Is your concern that...
>
> register_console(c)
> device_initialize(c->d)
> device_add(c->d)
> unregister_console(c)
> device_unregister(c->d) console_classdev_release(c->d)
> register_console(c)
> device_initialize(c->d) <-- classdev was not previously zeroed out
> in console_classdev_release() and bad things may happen
Note, you can not "recycle" a structure in the driver model. So when
the console is unregistered, it should be freed. When it is registered,
it should be created. Perhaps that is the confusion here?
thakns,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-18 14:24 [RFC PATCH] printk: console: Allow each console to have its own loglevel Chris Down
2022-05-18 14:32 ` Chris Down
2022-05-18 15:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-18 19:46 ` Chris Down
2022-05-18 19:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-18 20:27 ` Chris Down
2022-05-19 7:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-19 14:12 ` Chris Down
2022-05-19 14:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-19 15:08 ` Chris Down
2022-05-19 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-19 15:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-05-19 15:55 ` Chris Down
2022-05-19 17:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-05-19 17:55 ` Chris Down
2022-05-24 9:19 ` Petr Mladek
2022-05-30 10:48 ` [OFFLIST] " Chris Down
2022-05-30 10:49 ` Chris Down
2022-05-19 7:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-05-19 14:37 ` Chris Down
2022-05-19 17:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-05-19 18:05 ` Chris Down
2022-05-19 13:59 ` [printk] 6f922c8d53: BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoZhXe9CZE5o73fG@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox