public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: kcsan: Support detecting more missing memory barriers
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 12:14:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YodqC/HKVJLAjpQY@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220520031548.175582-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 11:15AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> As "kcsan: Support detecting a subset of missing memory barriers"[1]
> introduced KCSAN_STRICT/KCSAN_WEAK_MEMORY which make kcsan detects
> more missing memory barrier, but arm64 don't have KCSAN instrumentation
> for barriers, so the new selftest test_barrier() and test cases for
> memory barrier instrumentation in kcsan_test module will fail, even
> panic on selftest.
> 
> Let's prefix all barriers with __ on arm64, as asm-generic/barriers.h
> defined the final instrumented version of these barriers, which will
> fix the above issues.
> 
> Note, barrier instrumentation that can be disabled via __no_kcsan with
> appropriate compiler-support (and not just with objtool help), see
> commit bd3d5bd1a0ad ("kcsan: Support WEAK_MEMORY with Clang where no
> objtool support exists"), it adds disable_sanitizer_instrumentation to
> __no_kcsan attribute which will remove all sanitizer instrumentation fully
> (with Clang 14.0). Meanwhile, GCC does the same thing with no_sanitize.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20211130114433.2580590-1-elver@google.com/
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 12 ++++++------
>  include/asm-generic/barrier.h    |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 9f3e2c3d2ca0..2cfc4245d2e2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -50,13 +50,13 @@
>  #define pmr_sync()	do {} while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> -#define mb()		dsb(sy)
> -#define rmb()		dsb(ld)
> -#define wmb()		dsb(st)
> +#define __mb()		dsb(sy)
> +#define __rmb()		dsb(ld)
> +#define __wmb()		dsb(st)
>  
> -#define dma_mb()	dmb(osh)
> -#define dma_rmb()	dmb(oshld)
> -#define dma_wmb()	dmb(oshst)
> +#define __dma_mb()	dmb(osh)
> +#define __dma_rmb()	dmb(oshld)
> +#define __dma_wmb()	dmb(oshst)
>  
>  #define io_stop_wc()	dgh()
>  
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> index fd7e8fbaeef1..18863c50e9ce 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
>  #define wmb()	do { kcsan_wmb(); __wmb(); } while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef __dma_mb
> +#define dma_mb()	do { kcsan_mb(); __dma_mb(); } while (0)
> +#endif

The asm-generic changes might want to go into a separate patch, along
with the generic definition of dma_mb() if there's no __dma_mb, as
mentioned in the other email.

Thanks,
-- Marco

      reply	other threads:[~2022-05-20 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-20  3:15 [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Fix kcsan test_barrier fail and panic Kefeng Wang
2022-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation/barriers: Add memory barrier dma_mb() Kefeng Wang
2022-05-20 10:08   ` Marco Elver
2022-05-20 11:14     ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-20  3:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: kcsan: Support detecting more missing memory barriers Kefeng Wang
2022-05-20 10:14   ` Marco Elver [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YodqC/HKVJLAjpQY@elver.google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox