public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Cc: vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
	alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	dan.carpenter@oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ocelot: fix wront time_after usage
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:40:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoeMW+/KGk8VpbED@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220519204017.15586-1-paskripkin@gmail.com>

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:40:17PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> Accidentally noticed, that this driver is the only user of
> while (timer_after(jiffies...)).
> 
> It looks like typo, because likely this while loop will finish after 1st
> iteration, because time_after() returns true when 1st argument _is after_
> 2nd one.
> 
> Fix it by negating time_after return value inside while loops statement

A better fix would be to use one of the helpers in linux/iopoll.h.

There is a second bug in the current code:

static int ocelot_fdma_wait_chan_safe(struct ocelot *ocelot, int chan)
{
	unsigned long timeout;
	u32 safe;

	timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(OCELOT_FDMA_CH_SAFE_TIMEOUT_US);
	do {
		safe = ocelot_fdma_readl(ocelot, MSCC_FDMA_CH_SAFE);
		if (safe & BIT(chan))
			return 0;
	} while (time_after(jiffies, timeout));

	return -ETIMEDOUT;
}

The scheduler could put the thread to sleep, and it does not get woken
up for OCELOT_FDMA_CH_SAFE_TIMEOUT_US. During that time, the hardware
has done its thing, but you exit the while loop and return -ETIMEDOUT.

linux/iopoll.h handles this correctly by testing the state one more
time after the timeout has expired.

  Andrew

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-20 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-19 20:40 [PATCH] net: ocelot: fix wront time_after usage Pavel Skripkin
2022-05-19 23:13 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-20  8:21   ` Clément Léger
2022-05-20 12:40 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2022-05-20 21:06   ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-05-20 21:31   ` [PATCH v2] net: ocelot: fix wrong " Pavel Skripkin
2022-05-21 13:55     ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-21 16:21       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-23 14:00         ` Clément Léger
2022-05-27  3:42           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-24 15:14         ` Clément Léger
2022-06-27 14:46           ` Pavel Skripkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YoeMW+/KGk8VpbED@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox