From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: Fix multiple races in gfn=>pfn cache refresh
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 14:59:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YoesxTEUsdlCLgtb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <035a5300-27e1-e212-1ed7-0449e9d20615@redhat.com>
On Fri, May 20, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 4/27/22 03:40, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > + * Wait for mn_active_invalidate_count, not mmu_notifier_count,
> > + * to go away, as the invalidation in the mmu_notifier event
> > + * occurs_before_ mmu_notifier_count is elevated.
> > + *
> > + * Note, mn_active_invalidate_count can change at any time as
> > + * it's not protected by gpc->lock. But, it is guaranteed to
> > + * be elevated before the mmu_notifier acquires gpc->lock, and
> > + * isn't dropped until after mmu_notifier_seq is updated. So,
> > + * this task may get a false positive of sorts, i.e. see an
> > + * elevated count and wait even though it's technically safe to
> > + * proceed (becase the mmu_notifier will invalidate the cache
> > + *_after_ it's refreshed here), but the cache will never be
> > + * refreshed with stale data, i.e. won't get false negatives.
>
> I am all for lavish comments, but I think this is even too detailed.
Yeah, the false positive/negative stuff is probably overkill.
> What about:
>
> /*
> * mn_active_invalidate_count acts for all intents and purposes
> * like mmu_notifier_count here; but we cannot use the latter
> * because the invalidation in the mmu_notifier event occurs
> * _before_ mmu_notifier_count is elevated.
Looks good, though I'd prefer to avoid the "we", and explicitly call out that its
the invalidation of the caches.
/*
* mn_active_invalidate_count acts for all intents and purposes
* like mmu_notifier_count here; but the latter cannot be used
* here because the invalidation of caches in the mmu_notifier
* event occurs _before_ mmu_notifier_count is elevated.
*
* Note, it does not matter that mn_active_invalidate_count
* is not protected by gpc->lock. It is guaranteed to
* be elevated before the mmu_notifier acquires gpc->lock, and
* isn't dropped until after mmu_notifier_seq is updated.
*/
Also, you'll definitely want to look at v3 of this series. I'm 99% certain I didn't
change the comment though :-)
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220429210025.3293691-1-seanjc@google.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 1:39 [PATCH v2 0/8] KVM: Fix mmu_notifier vs. pfncache vs. pfncache races Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 1:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] Revert "KVM: Do not speculatively mark pfn cache valid to "fix" race" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 1:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] Revert "KVM: Fix race between mmu_notifier invalidation and pfncache refresh" Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 1:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] KVM: Drop unused @gpa param from gfn=>pfn cache's __release_gpc() helper Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 1:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] KVM: Put the extra pfn reference when reusing a pfn in the gpc cache Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 1:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] KVM: Do not incorporate page offset into gfn=>pfn cache user address Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 1:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] KVM: Fix multiple races in gfn=>pfn cache refresh Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 14:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-28 3:39 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-04-28 14:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-20 14:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-20 14:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-20 15:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-20 14:59 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-08-05 11:04 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-05 11:08 ` [PATCH] KVM: Move gfn_to_pfn_cache invalidation to invalidate_range_end hook David Woodhouse
2024-08-06 0:45 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-06 9:06 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-06 14:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-06 14:24 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-06 15:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-06 16:40 ` David Woodhouse
2024-08-22 9:00 ` David Woodhouse
2022-04-27 1:40 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] KVM: Do not pin pages tracked by gfn=>pfn caches Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 1:40 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] DO NOT MERGE: Hack-a-test to verify gpc invalidation+refresh Sean Christopherson
2022-04-27 15:17 ` David Woodhouse
2022-04-27 20:23 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YoesxTEUsdlCLgtb@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox