From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: fix get_host_event_wake_mask() returns
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 00:55:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yp6iG75RmirxRMu2@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABXOdTdvcycr-U2VniJSLqbvt=tiEDBmo+EUSx1eX8Nti8cXAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 7:12 AM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> wrote:
> > @@ -256,19 +256,16 @@ static int get_host_event_wake_mask(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, uint32_t *mas
> > msg->insize = sizeof(*r);
> >
> > ret = send_command(ec_dev, msg);
> > - if (ret >= 0) {
> > + if (ret > 0) {
>
> The idea here was to (potentially) return an error if ret == 0. This
> is no longer the case after this change. Instead, the caller has to
> check for ret == 0 and treat it as an error. I think it would make
> more sense to explicitly check for ret ==0, eg with something like
>
> mapped = cros_ec_map_error(msg->result);
> if (mapped) {
> ret = mapped;
> goto exit;
> }
> if (ret == 0) {
> ret = -EPROTO;
> goto exit;
> }
> ....
Ack, will fix in next version.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-07 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-06 14:10 [PATCH 00/13] platform/chrome: Kunit tests and refactor for cros_ec_query_all() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 01/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_commands: fix compile errors Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 15:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 02/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit tests for cros_ec_query_all() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 15:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-07 0:54 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-07 14:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 03/13] platform/chrome: use macros for passthru indexes Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 15:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-06 15:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 04/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: assign buffer size from protocol info Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 15:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 05/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: remove redundant NULL check Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 15:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 06/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: use cros_ec_map_error() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 15:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 07/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: separate fill_protocol_info() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 16:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-07 0:54 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 08/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: separate fill_protocol_info_legacy() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 16:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-07 0:55 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 09/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: use devm_krealloc() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 16:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 10/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: arrange get_host_command_version_mask() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 16:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-07 0:55 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 11/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: fix get_host_command_version_mask() returns Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 16:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 12/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: arrange get_host_event_wake_mask() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 16:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-07 0:55 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 14:10 ` [PATCH 13/13] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: fix get_host_event_wake_mask() returns Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-06 16:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-07 0:55 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yp6iG75RmirxRMu2@google.com \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=groeck@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox