From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED27CCA47B for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 10:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236781AbiFHKXW (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 06:23:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36914 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236437AbiFHKW6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 06:22:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com (mail-wm1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B7C81EEBBD; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 03:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id m125-20020a1ca383000000b0039c63fe5f64so460169wme.0; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 03:11:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=PFtvE+sjdjTR4WfMkXireHfiWAN2ebk+j1aP3yHfqKs=; b=IeYoHLLXZTcsfY4OvWWaBPI5i0t37LPtnKbBpJWVNflQ4SmN5fHZA9n/qsbZ3PQMnr EN3ESrqbB5a7Fm0xfNMa9rJ0xBP++U0u8UHDYD6+ICWrEAo2h8dZ4XSAdJoASisl2+1v hE3JQI9VJkWVyi7i+aNlduHKkh0MMiq24/2Kuw020SkQEV8oGujxXRZEjpGdBQ8mnEBE dkGsyKjFfh0bPHEqwrrhsawPbqxfUouPVOhhnddGEuVWOFJmYldMiWo6G9usdAdH2qIU 0FHrvEYnR5pJg8NFdcu68NZCMQ6xPGtpZ8eV2ibx1fz8xsACCWQQctFRNVDzZrAKO31w PAoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=PFtvE+sjdjTR4WfMkXireHfiWAN2ebk+j1aP3yHfqKs=; b=WmMTcyasOS+J2JeaWwaxrexgIqj7eEaJeCd8IfrYWpUobtZLjDePEV9HXGqr/ngMTn aGT4PXnVaaS+7QayFwXX3OrELSuzAZu7qHinIzfblWpUz8I9BVz4+u5BVn7uFZXPtOW5 fab9wUkECVKs3CMrmRg2vBw/UEVqzYePev7Pn2JO+kM5TcV0XGtSbcgX9++EyzYoz0Da Z1LJ6/ziC9V9oWKdh06KuHeijP22pi45wAnG7k6rOhAj2DWt1jZn3dDMFZqx/dwskAfE AkQyAnQ6pvWJhGpPMG4DsLr3HJsnKzYPZM4YOOwV5t2s94z7j1KOzd4p7EHTh/LvTqLu zzQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532yrvymON6zvRQApWHRMi4f3wa9GHBHmq5gaKG9+xkWzYvaWclu n8eAwqToV0VIBRYLfFxqOzs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIlMTGM5t4blGDk9b9txINiVFwxAtPe3wZIg7xHfnnsdYIT7dOE5fwjHV2kkIdZ0DLD8Wdmw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3d98:b0:39c:5cad:ab58 with SMTP id bi24-20020a05600c3d9800b0039c5cadab58mr6333391wmb.100.1654683105036; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 03:11:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x4-20020adfffc4000000b0021018642ff8sm20689744wrs.76.2022.06.08.03.11.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Jun 2022 03:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 11:11:42 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/452] 5.10.121-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220607164908.521895282@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220607164908.521895282@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 06:57:37PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.121 release. > There are 452 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:48:02 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220606): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1288 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1292 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip