From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.123-rc1 review
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:20:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqmkUkUtmHtSMEN7@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614183719.878453780@linuxfoundation.org>
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 08:40:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.123 release.
> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:37:02 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220612):
mips: 63 configs -> no failure
arm: 104 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1339
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1343
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 18:40 [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.123-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 01/11] Documentation: Add documentation for Processor MMIO Stale Data Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 02/11] x86/speculation/mmio: Enumerate Processor MMIO Stale Data bug Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 03/11] x86/speculation: Add a common function for MD_CLEAR mitigation update Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 04/11] x86/speculation/mmio: Add mitigation for Processor MMIO Stale Data Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 05/11] x86/bugs: Group MDS, TAA & Processor MMIO Stale Data mitigations Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 06/11] x86/speculation/mmio: Enable CPU Fill buffer clearing on idle Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 07/11] x86/speculation/mmio: Add sysfs reporting for Processor MMIO Stale Data Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 08/11] x86/speculation/srbds: Update SRBDS mitigation selection Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 09/11] x86/speculation/mmio: Reuse SRBDS mitigation for SBDS Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 10/11] KVM: x86/speculation: Disable Fill buffer clear within guests Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 18:40 ` [PATCH 5.10 11/11] x86/speculation/mmio: Print SMT warning Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-14 21:46 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.123-rc1 review Florian Fainelli
2022-06-15 2:46 ` Shuah Khan
2022-06-15 5:00 ` Fox Chen
2022-06-15 9:20 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2022-06-15 17:57 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-06-15 22:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-16 1:56 ` Samuel Zou
2022-06-16 3:28 ` Tyler Hicks
2022-06-16 8:48 ` Jon Hunter
2022-06-16 9:46 ` Ron Economos
2022-06-16 10:11 ` Jon Hunter
2022-06-16 13:16 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-16 13:11 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-16 13:17 ` Jon Hunter
2022-06-16 13:20 ` [PATCH] random: quiet urandom warning ratelimit suppression message Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-17 2:10 ` Ron Economos
2022-06-16 11:08 ` [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.123-rc1 review Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqmkUkUtmHtSMEN7@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=slade@sladewatkins.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox