From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87309C433EF for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 10:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236246AbiGAKe7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 06:34:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55260 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236241AbiGAKe4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2022 06:34:56 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8FE270E4E; Fri, 1 Jul 2022 03:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id cl1so2583727wrb.4; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 03:34:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UV84BF5cBxzD9zx/TkNLuFqo3S029h6omQw2ybz7xL0=; b=hrmcvAujQcgMmtFFtuUOC5QyzI7RFmwh9xGDOtbj9Hqx3uFV854Z8S+7MqBL/GCFy7 k4ddXrGe9bzZKz58MEw7I72rFjC15U+vvGUZmVNyWv83RA+EMzCyhtiqhYy43omaurvh YwKfgieyfKojnjbzAuXkfkDp7kyefJEPUdV4ijf//ghhD/Iu3T1e/81ffJ4oaMzIggVO ejcZ6yybYfRKAmv9CfHJQizyJJAwt+6qagtvEGrC+eJtt9t8mCMhtiwtPlfy+eSbRbyo R1XY75QZXfktqscQiz17GRA0cuGyKIkcEodvM2KSnishrFqgaZd1lPb+L1RkKAUkgThH urVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UV84BF5cBxzD9zx/TkNLuFqo3S029h6omQw2ybz7xL0=; b=YcyM8OfrEzKChYvV7U0u5k8hLGUcZvBc/lXM5neHClW6Y/zQI187gBYKQnVQDmNNfi DAzuimLlCQWMAAJ9XTQZ0k2UhqRo/Aq4wYDy6EiA0iIhB/oVLWwPM8EboFQ6qzlt+wiY MAiuC9VydksNJG8ZpPuOXBP4Tl5L/gvinn9KT38gbo6ORgBfnzHy+FJIb6+MwYW4tjKk xFnfGg+K7CME2Z83vwjFDyRjoeaz1PmjW1KXZGi7TBq0N27jJQ7P4LPv3cwKVfnoPyHg j767NOJlvhUCBP6NHiJmDpi2Q6xim4O8woSL57STqJrYfJQRTdwS/y3wBFejfklgDT+q Xe8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora93vevaBauEk5tyrEABpaZI6FVlhFXqxM46Zl9FgI9x8f1cmCne a51tuliq2ykX7lup6LNwGo+UiSNZieU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uvwp/m0djVdzmRpWXiYsWmf9D3si4CiC7nlqzHlJLkNwO2aDhY0TEeRpRAW/OWTksPSEv7gg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:598c:0:b0:21d:26b6:ee94 with SMTP id n12-20020a5d598c000000b0021d26b6ee94mr12890512wri.457.1656671691525; Fri, 01 Jul 2022 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v4-20020a7bcb44000000b0039746638d6esm9580991wmj.33.2022.07.01.03.34.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Jul 2022 03:34:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:34:49 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/12] 5.10.128-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220630133230.676254336@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220630133230.676254336@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:47:05PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.128 release. > There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:32:22 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220627): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1429 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1436 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip