Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for PolarFire SoC's musb controller

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:16:49PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21/06/2022 15:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:46:41PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> >> Hey Bin, Greg,
> >> Short series here adding support for USB on Microchip PolarFire SoC FPGAs.
> >> The kconfig dependency for INVENTRA_DMA has become a bit of a mouthful,
> >> is there a better way of dealing with that?
> >> Thanks,
> >> Conor.
> >>
> >> Changes since v1:
> >> - Drop unneeded resource copying as per Rob's changes to the other drivers
> >> - Drop the dts patch
> >>
> >> Conor Dooley (2):
> >>   usb: musb: Add support for PolarFire SoC's musb controller
> >>   MAINTAINERS: add musb to PolarFire SoC entry
> >>
> >>  MAINTAINERS               |   1 +
> >>  drivers/usb/musb/Kconfig  |  13 +-
> >>  drivers/usb/musb/Makefile |   1 +
> >>  drivers/usb/musb/mpfs.c   | 265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  4 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/usb/musb/mpfs.c
> >>
> >>
> >> base-commit: f2906aa863381afb0015a9eb7fefad885d4e5a56
> >> -- 
> >> 2.36.1
> >>
> > 
> > Any chance you can get your company to fix up their email settings:
> > 
> > Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20220613114642.1615292-1-conor.dooley%40microchip.com/t.mbox.gz
> > Analyzing 4 messages in the thread
> > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> > ---
> >   ✗ [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: musb: Add support for PolarFire SoC's musb controller
> >   ✗ [PATCH v2 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add musb to PolarFire SoC entry
> >   ---
> >   ✗ BADSIG: DKIM/microchip.com
> > ---
> > Total patches: 2
> > 
> > If I didn't know better, I would think you were spoofing the address...
> 
> Great, thanks. I was honestly hoping you would make this complaint.
> I brought it up with our IT before & nothing has happened yet.

It's amazing that your company emails are even making it to many systems
these days with that broken.

> At least now I have the direct complaint to forward :)

Please do, and tell them that in the future, some of us will probably
start requiring this to pass as I doubt they want just anyone to spoof
patches from your domain :)

thanks,

greg k-h