From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Mike Stowell <mstowell@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rtmutex: Limit # of lock stealing for non-RT waiters
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:32:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrRriHsAdxPwEnWW@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220621193641.609712-1-longman@redhat.com>
On 2022-06-21 15:36:41 [-0400], Waiman Long wrote:
> Commit 48eb3f4fcfd3 ("locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock
> stealing") allows unlimited number of lock stealing's for non-RT
> tasks. That can lead to lock starvation of non-RT top waiter tasks if
> there is a constant incoming stream of non-RT lockers. This can cause
> task lockup in PREEMPT_RT kernel. For example,
>
> [ 1249.921363] INFO: task systemd:2178 blocked for more than 622 seconds.
> [ 1872.984225] INFO: task kworker/6:4:63401 blocked for more than 622 seconds.
>
> Avoiding this problem and ensuring forward progress by limiting the
> number of times that a lock can be stolen from each waiter. This patch
> sets a threshold of 10. That number is arbitrary and can be changed
> if needed.
>
> With that change, the task lockups previously observed when running
> stressful workloads on PREEMPT_RT kernel disappeared.
Do you have more insight on how this was tested/ created? Based on that,
systemd and a random kworker waited on a lock for more than 10 minutes.
I added a trace-printk each time a non-RT waiter got the lock stolen,
kicked a kernel build and a package upgrade and took a look at the stats
an hour later:
- sh got its lock stolen 3416 times. I didn't lock the pid so I can't
look back and check how long it waited since the first time.
- the median average of stolen locks is 173.
> Fixes: 48eb3f4fcfd3 ("locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock stealing")
> Reported-by: Mike Stowell <mstowell@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-23 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-21 19:36 [PATCH v2] locking/rtmutex: Limit # of lock stealing for non-RT waiters Waiman Long
2022-06-21 19:38 ` Waiman Long
2022-06-23 13:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-06-23 14:41 ` Waiman Long
2022-06-24 6:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-06-25 2:23 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrRriHsAdxPwEnWW@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mstowell@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox