From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
"open list:CHROME HARDWARE PLATFORM SUPPORT"
<chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: separate cros_ec_wait_until_complete()
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 03:39:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrUx1UXR4OnuTgAN@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABXOdTeYf=KsaMeEMOcevRjitvkLDKPeTELfDSmCxyG0OWWjgQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 01:50:26PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:13 PM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org> wrote:
> > -static int cros_ec_send_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, struct cros_ec_command *msg)
> > +static int cros_ec_wait_until_complete(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, uint32_t *result)
> > {
> > - int ret = cros_ec_xfer_command(ec_dev, msg);
> > + struct cros_ec_command *msg;
> > + struct ec_response_get_comms_status *status;
> > + int ret = 0, i;
> > +
> > + msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*msg) + sizeof(*status), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!msg)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - if (msg->result == EC_RES_IN_PROGRESS) {
> > - int i;
> > - struct cros_ec_command *status_msg;
> > - struct ec_response_get_comms_status *status;
> > + msg->command = EC_CMD_GET_COMMS_STATUS;
> > + msg->insize = sizeof(*status);
> >
> > - status_msg = kmalloc(sizeof(*status_msg) + sizeof(*status),
> > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > - if (!status_msg)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + status = (struct ec_response_get_comms_status *)msg->data;
> >
> > - status_msg->version = 0;
> > - status_msg->command = EC_CMD_GET_COMMS_STATUS;
> > - status_msg->insize = sizeof(*status);
> > - status_msg->outsize = 0;
> > + /* Query the EC's status until it's no longer busy or we encounter an error. */
> > + for (i = 0; i < EC_COMMAND_RETRIES; ++i) {
> > + usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Query the EC's status until it's no longer busy or
> > - * we encounter an error.
> > - */
> > - for (i = 0; i < EC_COMMAND_RETRIES; i++) {
> > - usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> > -
> > - trace_cros_ec_request_start(status_msg);
> > - ret = (*xfer_fxn)(ec_dev, status_msg);
> > - trace_cros_ec_request_done(status_msg, ret);
>
> I'll have to spend more time on this; I don't immediately see (from
> the diff) the replacement for the traces, and I don't see what
> happened with xfer_fxn.
They are replaced by calling cros_ec_xfer_command() (see below) which does the
same things.
> > - if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> > - continue;
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - break;
> > -
> > - msg->result = status_msg->result;
> > - if (status_msg->result != EC_RES_SUCCESS)
> > - break;
> > -
> > - status = (struct ec_response_get_comms_status *)
> > - status_msg->data;
> > - if (!(status->flags & EC_COMMS_STATUS_PROCESSING))
> > - break;
> > - }
> > + ret = cros_ec_xfer_command(ec_dev, msg);
> > + if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> > + continue;
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-24 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-15 5:12 [PATCH 00/11] platform/chrome: Kunit tests and refactor for cros_ec_cmd_xfer() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 01/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add "cros_ec_" prefix to send_command() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 16:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 02/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit tests for cros_ec_cmd_xfer() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 16:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 03/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit tests for cros_ec_send_command() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 16:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 04/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: separate cros_ec_xfer_command() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 16:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 05/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: separate cros_ec_wait_until_complete() Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 20:50 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-06-24 3:39 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 06/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: change Kunit expectation when timed out Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 07/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: return -EAGAIN when retries " Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 08/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: change Kunit expectation for EC errors Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 09/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: return standard error codes " Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 10/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: add Kunit test for empty payload Tzung-Bi Shih
2022-06-15 5:12 ` [PATCH 11/11] platform/chrome: cros_ec_proto: return -EPROTO if " Tzung-Bi Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrUx1UXR4OnuTgAN@google.com \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=groeck@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox