From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] dma-buf: remove useless FMODE_LSEEK flag
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 11:38:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yrl6nTFibUS7xISn@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrlzkAlheCR0ZMuO@phenom.ffwll.local>
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:08:32AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 01:01:14PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > This is already set by anon_inode_getfile(), since dma_buf_fops has
> > non-NULL ->llseek, so we don't need to set it here too.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
>
> I'm assuming this is part of a vfs cleanup and lands through that tree?
> For that:
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
With the exception of the first patch (which is more urgent), yes, that
is my assumption too.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-27 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-25 11:01 [PATCH v2 0/8] cleanup llseek and splice Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ksmbd: use vfs_llseek instead of dereferencing NULL Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-25 22:15 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-26 0:54 ` Steve French
2022-06-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] fs: do not set no_llseek in fops Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] fs: clear or set FMODE_LSEEK based on llseek function Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-25 13:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-25 13:29 ` Al Viro
2022-06-25 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-25 14:11 ` Al Viro
2022-06-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] fs: check FMODE_LSEEK to control internal pipe splicing Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] fs: do not compare against ->llseek Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] fs: remove no_llseek Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-25 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-25 21:53 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] dma-buf: remove useless FMODE_LSEEK flag Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-27 9:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-06-27 9:38 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2022-06-29 10:30 ` Sumit Semwal
2022-06-25 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] vfio: do not set " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-06-27 20:07 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yrl6nTFibUS7xISn@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox