Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: Thunderbolt: ctl.c: Fixed comment coding style issues

[Gabriel Viso Carrera <gabriel@gvisoc.com>]

On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 02:37:54AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> 
> I'd indent this only 1 level and put it before the call
> (and fix the loose/lose typo)
> 
> {
> 	/* We ignore failures during stop.
> 	 * All rx packets are referenced from ctl->rx_packets,
> 	 * so we do not lose them.
> 	 */
> 	tb_ring_rx(pkg->ctl->rx, &pkg->frame);
> }
> 

Fair enough. Not sure on how to proceed, as these were my 
first patches ever sent, and I don't want to make anyone 
work more than the strictly necessary. 

- Should I submit an additional patch intended to be applied 
on top of 3/3?
- Should I sumbit a whole new 3/3, addressing the whole comment
issues all at once?
- Should I just wait on the outcome and proceed from there?

Advice would be appreciated.

Anyway, I will be sending some patches over other files for 
the time being, paying more attention to the details.

Thanks,
~Gabriel