From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B236BC433EF for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233722AbiGLOqq (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:46:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40382 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233625AbiGLOqn (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 10:46:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C8926111A; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id r10so5344955wrv.4; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:46:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=5v7ri+BJdcgpfgQ0J3MM2VhodQ3zOiHarfupjfMFRVc=; b=iIwLJOmRGc/3/AglvZYoEUS9OF/shQLjSEWip/rIjAEUdM9rcl6DfWMgZ09H1FQ7w3 X1rQbH8IAr9YsKFYP5vp5ZImzsIxB+KGBPsnTNBU5M1qbASA6IQEZUXwCmIQJHkIKGKH Ymo9gVxs0ge7sC7H9UrgUIbFs5zkAQrArUDUTOYVFwMQTvFOs/umdTgA12IzyjAAjUIL fI7uiHs6X+rb2aV/XTIao2YLtpEGs6A/z5x32rLh1Es9QnJhOWXOfuP3NboY3XPUWPAT HnsNlMryMb/5VejcuoZ69xUtNyybJF3SZlu3E88MEP10tNV7XN+0ljYaf17I+LR6n/q9 coyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=5v7ri+BJdcgpfgQ0J3MM2VhodQ3zOiHarfupjfMFRVc=; b=qNHxKjtXEYWTqOfolE8EWQacTEK4++6uFEf5+yKA7pwC1RBmk7MigPsOwPeFhp9Qhn dBLdPyL9KwdkSX3Kb9VPF0SdAh3w/b7HkChtgpox8ooR3C2jbGQYJxe5I4KE3L7olz9u rGY7vMMgZaW2wiIu+/67iXAnb3k7lCcg0NLNp7Mcy/QUFhG6sfwuXCarnZIedn3jdSF7 trFayfsjPyh3R4BDMho6lUv1Xgp66WTskjj0XnbVvskv960nd4/DlZubjHQYoAvGI+0I KVjD/onkLjrO04clgsJHJSA3xrKx8gHq7joCf7h+ZGGZj7staStnEJEvl4rKpNgKXcbY A1Kg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/+O4bIYnNHtxVfp1rgPE6EdzMErniGMR/fLNldXEwV9JfMNZY1 pvDVLFxIElvihUyCX2lwcySSUmyN/A8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sRzRRUw+RZYQ/zz9Xdmb0SBdw19bBoJAcSUzJtlTPvrv797Dv/PWoMvqzH/RXl9f/PHD7wTA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d1c6:0:b0:21d:8013:cdab with SMTP id b6-20020adfd1c6000000b0021d8013cdabmr21901133wrd.47.1657637201082; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-47-22.as13285.net. [78.150.47.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s14-20020adfeb0e000000b0021d7fa77710sm8446909wrn.92.2022.07.12.07.46.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:46:38 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/38] 5.4.205-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220711090538.722676354@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220711090538.722676354@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:06:42AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.205 release. > There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:05:28 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220706): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1493 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip