From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A13C43334 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:09:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235555AbiGMKJj (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 06:09:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35692 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235503AbiGMKJh (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 06:09:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD39D515A; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 03:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id v14so14782712wra.5; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 03:09:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Ijw1Pj9mlwCMZV0dKb2NxQ12t1IxBRC3ITFocW6Ygu8=; b=qfhYomL/hIUTsLfOE29RbhT7+fpojiJFR+9+FKQSJ0lKCBW0kbEXVNnXkpEsiOxcG8 CoGGKthycMvHQhri66yG1htJTDPD3DH/nFHke6n+xOoTyY1K/nYZ3WU9U5cC/oxMacfO i2qKkAv0Y99DnT549erFzSUwuikQMM65TF3owJhDwdtHp3Lro3Qjs5o7R2hwMOqbq51D ut+wCDIklEoNqfLnKZo1tBXhys3AIXyTd7CbViL1K7JEul5ZpSx+XNWSbDgoFNi8l+E6 TehsuW0Slvr868okRcU5RuIPL5ZDdk9fBlFL1V7NfSMJtNBVfVMRr7A/fHoFbTm0BWmZ yarA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Ijw1Pj9mlwCMZV0dKb2NxQ12t1IxBRC3ITFocW6Ygu8=; b=aoJgw7SadIFomlZwyyEIom6e9dTjLRDBIu2zHSkrFDUaPnykpf93jU3sfHglrAuLvw uI6CiLxXifenYtifoOfsjLa0PztU5pa641/8FHzcjHwxvX6Bt99Z4zQayBD/nODtnqgC Ov8u7NL86d39eRJcUepvfN3xufYCI9l7bxvRd8w1E9QuCkPbF5oOVyJzVhB/Oz/X2F1m FR67H/t4VrpjDF7xZN+TRdn1PAyUHOc0Ni5/JaT8O3Uwy/V01puKzJ7tVmCCR2SRo3FA Iozec0q7vw91loK9zoudtvGMmVMn2uOJr9iDbzZP8JQuJs4M0CN20OI6y7/ktNnDMbwu RRDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+1V1E0nHvaWX0zLY4Nx4a2rgtbGm6gqgNbgNPOaSEOJvA73PlY ZaSX6xf/bBBYLKfLJhFLq0t9OtvL/xw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1smG189SqCRB9E1eVnbwGIe0z3YpAy+TUsVBU/Qzaq2TX3lLMuUDfI2SSMIdTlNfKMJHQFQxA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6dae:0:b0:21d:ac34:d087 with SMTP id u14-20020a5d6dae000000b0021dac34d087mr2584531wrs.336.1657706973656; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 03:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-47-22.as13285.net. [78.150.47.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q19-20020a1ce913000000b003a2cf5eb900sm1572920wmc.40.2022.07.13.03.09.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 03:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:09:31 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/78] 5.15.55-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220712183238.844813653@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220712183238.844813653@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 08:38:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.55 release. > There are 78 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:32:19 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220706): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1508 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1511 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1514 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip