From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] random: remove CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:46:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ys7ox2TNyq36APxD@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220708004032.733426-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 02:40:32AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> When RDRAND was introduced, there was much discussion on whether it
> should be trusted and how the kernel should handle that. Initially, two
> mechanisms cropped up, CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM, a compile time switch, and
> "nordrand", a boot-time switch.
>
> Later the thinking evolved. With a properly designed RNG, using RDRAND
> values alone won't harm anything, even if the outputs are malicious.
> Rather, the issue is whether those values are being *trusted* to be good
> or not. And so a new set of options were introduced as the real
> ones that people use -- CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_CPU and "random.trust_cpu".
> With these options, RDRAND is used, but it's not always credited. So in
> the worst case, it does nothing, and in the best case, maybe it helps.
>
> Along the way, CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM's meaning got sort of pulled into the
> center and became something certain platforms force-select.
>
> The old options don't really help with much, and it's a bit odd to have
> special handling for these instructions when the kernel can deal fine
> with the existence or untrusted existence or broken existence or
> non-existence of that CPU capability.
>
> Simplify the situation by removing CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM and using the
> ordinary asm-generic fallback pattern instead, keeping the two options
> that are actually used. For now it leaves "nordrand" for now, as the
> removal of that will take a different route.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
For arm64:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-13 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-05 19:01 [PATCH] random: remove CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM and "nordrand" Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-05 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-05 19:44 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-05 19:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-05 21:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-07-05 22:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-05 23:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-07-06 12:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-06 16:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-07-06 0:28 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-06 0:32 ` [PATCH v2] random: remove CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-06 6:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-07-06 8:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-07-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-06 12:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-06 13:55 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-06 14:35 ` [PATCH v4] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-08 0:40 ` [PATCH v5] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-07-13 15:46 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-07-18 12:53 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-08-12 13:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-06 12:30 ` [PATCH] random: remove CONFIG_ARCH_RANDOM and "nordrand" Borislav Petkov
2022-07-06 14:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-07-06 15:24 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ys7ox2TNyq36APxD@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox