public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	elver@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	vschneid@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] cpumask: Add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2022 14:47:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsC9CuiLRbhMAC51@yury-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a92869b902a075b97be5d1452c9c6badbbff0df.1656777646.git.sander@svanheule.net>

On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 06:08:27PM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> On uniprocessor builds, the following loops will always run over a mask
> that contains one enabled CPU (cpu0):
>     - for_each_possible_cpu
>     - for_each_online_cpu
>     - for_each_present_cpu
> 
> Provide uniprocessor-specific macros for these loops, that always run
> exactly once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>

Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/cpumask.h | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 7fbef41b3093..6c5b4ee000f2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -750,9 +750,16 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS);
>  /* First bits of cpu_bit_bitmap are in fact unset. */
>  #define cpu_none_mask to_cpumask(cpu_bit_bitmap[0])
>  
> +#if NR_CPUS == 1
> +/* Uniprocessor: the possible/online/present masks are always "1" */
> +#define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
> +#define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
> +#define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)	for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++)
> +#else
>  #define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask)
>  #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu)   for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask)
>  #define for_each_present_cpu(cpu)  for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask)
> +#endif
>  
>  /* Wrappers for arch boot code to manipulate normally-constant masks */
>  void init_cpu_present(const struct cpumask *src);
> -- 
> 2.36.1

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-02 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-02 16:08 [PATCH v4 0/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] x86/cacheinfo: move shared cache map definitions Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor mask assumption Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 21:42   ` Yury Norov
2022-07-03 14:17     ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] lib/test: Introduce cpumask KUnit test suite Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 21:45   ` Yury Norov
2022-07-03  7:26     ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-19 21:31   ` Maíra Canal
2022-07-20  5:24     ` David Gow
2022-07-20 12:43       ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-20 12:47     ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] cpumask: Add UP optimised for_each_*_cpu versions Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 21:47   ` Yury Norov [this message]
2022-07-02 21:50     ` Yury Norov
2022-07-03  7:37       ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] cpumask: Update cpumask_next_wrap() signature Sander Vanheule
2022-07-02 20:38 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] cpumask: Fix invalid uniprocessor assumptions Andrew Morton
2022-07-03  7:50   ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-03 20:39     ` Andrew Morton
2022-07-10  6:51       ` Sander Vanheule
2022-07-11 20:22         ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YsC9CuiLRbhMAC51@yury-laptop \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sander@svanheule.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox