public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org,
	sanyog.r.kale@intel.com, bard.liao@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: bus_type: fix remove and shutdown support
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:13:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsJ97kNAmz7U+42m@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a861f3b2-dec4-982d-0939-1dfc18dd2f53@linux.intel.com>

On 23-06-22, 09:54, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/23/22 02:55, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 10-06-22, 09:51, Bard Liao wrote:
> >> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> The bus sdw_drv_remove() and sdw_drv_shutdown() helpers are used
> >> conditionally, if the driver provides these routines.
> >>
> >> These helpers already test if the driver provides a .remove or
> >> .shutdown callback, so there's no harm in invoking the
> >> sdw_drv_remove() and sdw_drv_shutdown() unconditionally.
> > 
> > Okay sounds good
> > 
> >> In addition, the current code is imbalanced with
> >> dev_pm_domain_attach() called from sdw_drv_probe(), but
> >> dev_pm_domain_detach() called from sdw_drv_remove() only if the driver
> >> provides a .remove callback.
> > 
> > Am not sure I follow what is imbalance, pm_domain_attach/detach?
> 
> Yes, the dev_pm_domain_detach() is done conditionally, depending on the
> presence of a driver .remove callback, that's not so good.

Sorry am bit confused now, this is what I have in sdw-next

static int sdw_drv_remove(struct device *dev)
{
        struct sdw_slave *slave = dev_to_sdw_dev(dev);
        struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_driver(dev->driver);
        int ret = 0;

        if (drv->remove)
                ret = drv->remove(slave);

        dev_pm_domain_detach(dev, false);

        return ret;
}

I see that dev_pm_domain_detach() is called unconditionally and not
dependent on remove method which seems right to me.

The code seems same since 9251345dca24b

-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-04  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-10  1:51 [PATCH] soundwire: bus_type: fix remove and shutdown support Bard Liao
2022-06-23  7:55 ` Vinod Koul
2022-06-23 14:54   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2022-07-04  5:43     ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2022-07-04  6:20       ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YsJ97kNAmz7U+42m@matsya \
    --to=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox