From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD0AC43334 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 10:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231921AbiGFKWK (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 06:22:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60926 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233205AbiGFKVt (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 06:21:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64E332715A; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 03:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id v14so21379624wra.5; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:21:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uEHh4GEP9EGPyx2OPtnoe9ayGXgmmZLOmFwUk1Akya8=; b=Gbd5BjMdj/NZowumQ+VnsG0Y7aMPE4mv0fXyAewoMbgxf5bna1GgTD7fbMNzMct/LS X4DO7FDPaOp85/oV5GInGQhXrA+bPY9JqxvJK86jdJXYJ+k2oC+ut1tQ6CHhBW61EOVC y+eTl3iCcgKeXjBcMQBFiOHuLnu3AYtOgjSJcdcW7KdHVCEp0YywYt9t93dXu3/X/Atk +bxF99Q8zYfmJTiAsUAw6BtmFXt/1zmK2AW8dIV0UXAGx9TBd9NyjnoWabnICclG0355 gOILpiogZ7KFe592jOTVN0oOaVQvLFZ2mVLz+nsSc7/PJA0o79HN2j2mSXwi37HQxbMV ep1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uEHh4GEP9EGPyx2OPtnoe9ayGXgmmZLOmFwUk1Akya8=; b=MfJFtpCkMH3msvsQegCMxkBmvAqP+UQ1oeyWX7fJGf7KgMCMtbgx6xV8wSP/+yTtSh geJfpJGBsa6QkEqBdKtivzuAhPwBvPyY5kb2Z0n1jZWt0Rw7dTp2vY0q/nUk76R31RIw 7Af/UX3Q86GbMcw+y3VL0zE/1awGk1znqWKVEocz4Fq9hNVS2WLFF48SCyCfBchLAHUT 4x5m+yX4s+hNSUI0T68WPaFEvYBlmrpIylt9A+0R8S8+iORETkquz5bjnJ06GdlXOepj dEBcsfTfTTIT5wHGJHMx+swNbIc8eYWwctD1zoltTB8sGLgNlSIDniV0MFMS5HxmKara 9JLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8oPkIRn1bNzVWrDgqCJafsAu+C+JL50YGzunNzIMkAOBgNwrrb bwmRQ/A4DTW67YqHgWGzF4M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1skWE3Dv/8Q1wMYa1A89flq9kAodkHzWPqKswBbq9td3sdVT6+aUfBnz8oWuBc9sjU/2HpF9Q== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d1eb:0:b0:21b:dbb5:fe05 with SMTP id g11-20020adfd1eb000000b0021bdbb5fe05mr36960896wrd.651.1657102892039; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t5-20020a1c4605000000b0039db31f6372sm21875103wma.2.2022.07.06.03.21.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 11:21:29 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/33] 4.19.251-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220705115606.709817198@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220705115606.709817198@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:57:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.251 release. > There are 33 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220627): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 115 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1455 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip