From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/core: Always flush pending blk_plug
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:53:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ysg23mJmFiBc/eA1@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220708093213.1635880-1-john@metanate.com>
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:32:12AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> It seems that the intent here is to skip blk_flush_plug() in the case
> where a non-preemptible lock (such as a spinlock) has been converted to
> a rtmutex on RT, which is the case covered by the SM_RTLOCK_WAIT
> schedule flag. But sched_submit_work() is only called from schedule()
> which is never called in this scenario, so the check can simply be
> deleted.
> include/linux/sched/rt.h | 8 --------
> kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ---
> 2 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/rt.h b/include/linux/sched/rt.h
> index e5af028c08b49..994c25640e156 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/rt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/rt.h
> @@ -39,20 +39,12 @@ static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_task(struct task_struct *p)
> }
> extern void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *pi_task);
> extern void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *p);
> -static inline bool tsk_is_pi_blocked(struct task_struct *tsk)
> -{
> - return tsk->pi_blocked_on != NULL;
> -}
> #else
> static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_task(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> # define rt_mutex_adjust_pi(p) do { } while (0)
> -static inline bool tsk_is_pi_blocked(struct task_struct *tsk)
> -{
> - return false;
> -}
> #endif
>
> extern void normalize_rt_tasks(void);
Excellent, glad to see the back of that.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 1d4660a1915b3..e4974fe003b5b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6578,9 +6578,6 @@ static inline void sched_submit_work(struct task_struct *tsk)
> io_wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
> }
>
> - if (tsk_is_pi_blocked(tsk))
> - return;
> -
Would it make sense to replace this with:
SCHED_WARN_ON(current->__state & TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT);
Along with a comment along the lines of:
> - spinlock and rwlock must not flush block requests. This will deadlock
> if the callback attempts to acquire a lock which is already acquired.
> Similarly to being preempted, there should be no warning if the
> scheduling point is within a RCU read section.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-08 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-08 9:32 [PATCH v2] sched/core: Always flush pending blk_plug John Keeping
2022-07-08 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ysg23mJmFiBc/eA1@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=john@metanate.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox