From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, lczerner@redhat.com, enwlinux@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
yebin10@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_ioctl_setflags and ext4_fiemap
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 16:10:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtF1XygwvIo2Dwae@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715023928.2701166-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 10:39:28AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
> This patch and problem analysis is based on v4.19 LTS.
> The d3b6f23f7167("ext4: move ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework") patch
> is incorporated in v5.7-rc1. This patch avoids this problem by switching
> to iomap in ext4_fiemap.
>
> Hulk Robot reported a BUG on stable 4.19.252:
> ==================================================================
> kernel BUG at fs/ext4/extents_status.c:762!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
> CPU: 7 PID: 2845 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 4.19.252 #46
> RIP: 0010:ext4_es_cache_extent+0x30e/0x370
> [...]
> Call Trace:
> ext4_cache_extents+0x238/0x2f0
> ext4_find_extent+0x785/0xa40
> ext4_fiemap+0x36d/0xe90
> do_vfs_ioctl+0x6af/0x1200
> [...]
> ==================================================================
>
> Above issue may happen as follows:
> -------------------------------------
> cpu1 cpu2
> _____________________|_____________________
> do_vfs_ioctl
> ext4_ioctl
> ext4_ioctl_setflags
> ext4_ind_migrate
> do_vfs_ioctl
> ioctl_fiemap
> ext4_fiemap
> ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)
> ext4_fill_fiemap_extents
> down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> ext4_ext_check_inode
> ext4_clear_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)
> memset(ei->i_data, 0, sizeof(ei->i_data))
> up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> ext4_find_extent
> ext4_cache_extents
> ext4_es_cache_extent
> BUG_ON(end < lblk)
>
> We can easily reproduce this problem with the syzkaller testcase:
> ```
> 02:37:07 executing program 3:
> r0 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040)='./file0\x00', 0x26e1, 0x0)
> ioctl$FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR(r0, 0x40086602, &(0x7f0000000080)={0x17e})
> mkdirat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f00000000c0)='./file1\x00', 0x1ff)
> r1 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000100)='./file1\x00', 0x0, 0x0)
> ioctl$FS_IOC_FIEMAP(r1, 0xc020660b, &(0x7f0000000180)={0x0, 0x1, 0x0, 0xef3, 0x6, []}) (async, rerun: 32)
> ioctl$FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR(r1, 0x40086602, &(0x7f0000000140)={0x17e}) (rerun: 32)
> ```
>
> To solve this issue, we use __generic_block_fiemap() instead of
> generic_block_fiemap() and add inode_lock_shared to avoid race condition.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
What is the git commit id of this change in Linus's tree?
If it is not in Linus's tree, why not?
confused,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-15 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-15 2:39 [PATCH 4.19] ext4: fix race condition between ext4_ioctl_setflags and ext4_fiemap Baokun Li
2022-07-15 14:10 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-07-16 2:33 ` Baokun Li
2022-07-19 11:26 ` Greg KH
2022-07-19 12:15 ` Baokun Li
2022-07-19 12:25 ` Greg KH
2022-07-19 18:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-07-19 19:14 ` Greg KH
2022-07-20 2:04 ` Baokun Li
2022-07-19 14:06 ` Theodore Ts'o
2022-07-20 1:52 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YtF1XygwvIo2Dwae@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=enwlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=hulkci@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox